Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
i guess the point is it is not merely suggested anymore. They have proof now -- his lap top.
But the D.C. Police and some in the (Obama) FBI are still not giving up evidence needed for the investigation.
The Obama FBI? Trump has been president for 4 (miserable) months and had no problem firing the director of the FBI or revealing confidential information. The FBI has the emails. Don't you think they would have been made public by now if they implicate Obama or the Clintons?
Assange basically admitted Seth Rich as his source when he put out a reward to solve is murder. If he was not a source, why would Assange care about a random robbery gone awry in DC? I took that as Assange trying to "hint" at it without actually outing a source, dead or not.
The Obama FBI? Trump has been president for 4 (miserable) months and had no problem firing the director of the FBI or revealing confidential information. The FBI has the emails. Don't you think they would have been made public by now if they implicate Obama or the Clintons?
This would not implicate the Obamas or the Clintons. But the FBI would be admitting that they and the intel community were wrong in stating the source of the emails. They are not going to do that.
Why did the DNC not allow the FBI to search their hard drives after the hack? That is suspicious!! Is it because they already knew the Russians were not behind the DNC hack but instead one of their own? Not to mention, one of their own that was mysteriously gunned down in a botched robbery (robbery where nothing was stolen)?
Does anyone know if Seth Rich supported Bernie? If so, he was probably pissed when he uncovered the DNC backstabbing Bernie and decided to do something about it.
This would not implicate the Obamas or the Clintons. But the FBI would be admitting that they and the intel community were wrong in stating the source of the emails. They are not going to do that.
Can't Trump make them release the source of the emails? The article said the FBI has the emails.
Can't Trump make them release the source of the emails? The article said the FBI has the emails.
If it is an ongoing investigation I am not sure if Trump can force that. I can see that with Assange issuing reward money for finding Rich's murderers does imply Rich was the source. Otherwise solving the case could eliminate Rich as the Wikileaks contact.
The Obama FBI? Trump has been president for 4 (miserable) months and had no problem firing the director of the FBI or revealing confidential information. The FBI has the emails. Don't you think they would have been made public by now if they implicate Obama or the Clintons?
No, I don't.
The Justice Dept is still full of too many corrupted Obama lackeys and many are extreme Trump haters.
They are leaking classified info and conversations.
They are acting as "anonymous sources" with Fake news on Trump.
They went along with so many scandals, corruption, suspicious immunities, etc in the Obama administration, I don't trust them one bit.
Hopefully in another year or two they will all be purged out of the DOJ.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
