Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
When Russian hackers broke into DNC servers and Podesta's e-mail, gave the stolen data to WikiLeaks, and then distributed it, that's all a violation of a federal cybercrime act. It's a felony. If Trump and his staff helped or directed or conspired with this operation, then they could be charged with being accessories to a felony. And there's the espionage act. Plus obstruction of justice. And money laundering and tax evasion.
No. The IRS is only concerned with taxes owed and paid. It does not investigate money laundering. The Treasury has a financial crimes unit called FINCEN. And they've been very, very busy lately
I.R.S is part of the U.S. Department of Treasury investigate money laundering....that's a big agency.
The I.R.S has a crime division call the C.I. CI special agents are duly sworn law enforcement officers who investigate complex financial crimes associated with tax evasion, money laundering, narcotics, public corruption, and much more.......the IRS does a lot more than just collect taxes owed and taxes paid.
When Russian hackers broke into DNC servers and Podesta's e-mail, gave the stolen data to WikiLeaks, and then distributed it, that's all a violation of a federal cybercrime act. It's a felony. If Trump and his staff helped or directed or conspired with this operation, then they could be charged with being accessories to a felony. And there's the espionage act. Plus obstruction of justice. And money laundering and tax evasion.
WIKILEAKS has said it didn't come from the Russians......but lets pretend the Russians hacked into Podestas's emails and gave it to Wikileaks.....what does this has to do with Trump?......not only you have to prove that Russia hacked into Podesta's emails but they gave it to WIKILEAKS to publish it and that Trump helped or directed the operation.
I know you democrats have Russia hysteria and are hurting from that upset of an election but come on!....LOL
Trump can't pardon anybody who hasn't been indicted....
Not only can a president pardon someone who hasn't been indicted, President Ford did pardon former President Nixon even though Nixon hadn't been indicted on any charges.
I honestly don't know what all the fuss is about. Trump was elected in a free and fair manner by the American People. If they want Russia to control the country, they can vote for it. And they did.
Mueller and et all don't realize the problem here. It's not Trump. He did what he was elected to do - and getting rid of him will mean we no longer have a country. There is no question Trump is beholden to Russia. But that is who and what the country elected. So be it..
The problem is a free people can vote to throw themselves off a cliff, and that is exactly what America did in 2016.
so legally and constitutionally he can pardon anybody he wants right?......so what's the problem?
again, Trump doesn't have to pardon anybody especially anybody that was connected to his campaign.....this is wishful thinking from democrats....Mueller is a long way from an indictment and a conviction...right now is a big burger of nothing.
Manafort and his partners were sued in court in 2015 by Oleg V. Deripaska a Russian Oligarchs for $19 million for a failed investment in a Ukrainian cable television. Also a ledger was recovered in Ukraine indicated over $12M was designated for him by the Party of Regions and some of that money was to be routed through offshore accounts.
This is going to be a full time job for Mueller, this guy is really shady. What type of work was he doing for $12M and how does he get loans for $17M, what is his area of expertise.
When Russian hackers broke into DNC servers and Podesta's e-mail, gave the stolen data to WikiLeaks, and then distributed it, that's all a violation of a federal cybercrime act. It's a felony. If Trump and his staff helped or directed or conspired with this operation, then they could be charged with being accessories to a felony. And there's the espionage act. Plus obstruction of justice. And money laundering and tax evasion.
Lying on the Security Clearance form, lying under oath, witness tampering, blackmail, tax evasion, racketeering.
Not only can a president pardon someone who hasn't been indicted, President Ford did pardon former President Nixon even though Nixon hadn't been indicted on any charges.
Seriously, you didn't know that?
Ford pardoned Nixon because he was about to be impeach, you didn't know that?.......he just beat Congress to the punch. Ford would have anger more people if he let the process run for impeachment and then give a pardon.
I never heard a President pardon somebody that was not indicted or not about to get indicted .....but if you say so.
Usually how it works is a President pardons somebody who has been indicted or about to get indicted or convicted.......if there is no strong evidence on the person the President and his team won't even bother.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
