Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Under Obama, the Democrat party was destroyed. They lost the US House, the US Senate, the Presidency (and Bill Clinton's wife was supposed to be a sure thing), most of the Governor's houses and 68 of the 98 partisan state chambers. And they have lost every special election since Nov 8th. Devastating.
Yet what do they do? They are going to have Obama campaign for them some more. Insanity?
Under Obama, the Democrat party was destroyed. They lost the US House, the US Senate, the Presidency (and Bill Clinton's wife was supposed to be a sure thing), most of the Governor's houses and 68 of the 98 partisan state chambers. And they have lost every special election since Nov 8th. Devastating.
Yet what do they do? They are going to have Obama campaign for them some more. Insanity?
I'm curious what makes you say this. Is it because OP said "Obama"? Is it because OP said "Dems"? What makes you say that she's "scared" of this failed experiment by the left?
The title of the thread gave the OP away. Most ex-presidents come out and work for their own party after they leave office. For the OP to characterize that very normal occurrence as "desperate" was telling. It's a case of "the lady doth protest too much, methinks."
How can President Obama reentering the political scene be a "failed experiment" when it hasn't even begun yet?
Democrats should to a thorough self-examination on why they have been destroyed as a political party over the last 8 years.
Adopt a new platform that isn't so toxic to much of America.
Campaign on this new platform.
It's as simple as that.
You are correct. Rolling out the same old, same old, is stupid.
But every cause wants a familiar, popular face. Obama is the only contender that I can think of that fits that for Dems so, to me, it made sense. Just like Reagan would make sense to me for conservatives whereas the Bushes and Trump is less of a unifying factor (though very popular to those who support them). Who knows, maybe it will be Trump after he's out of office! Just saying not sure Dems have a better choice at this point.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.