Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should transgendered individuals be able to serve in United States of America's military?
Yes 101 52.33%
No 92 47.67%
Voters: 193. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-26-2017, 05:14 PM
 
16,345 posts, read 18,071,077 times
Reputation: 7879

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1 View Post
Service members prescribed viagra (or other versions of it) do not need to take that medication on a daily or other regular basis to maintain medical stability. No one needs to keep taking viagra in a combat situation.
You know what happens if a transgender person doesn't take daily hormones? Nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-26-2017, 05:15 PM
 
Location: Born & Raised DC > Carolinas > Seattle > Denver
9,338 posts, read 7,113,345 times
Reputation: 9487
The opinion of this 34 year veteran outweighs the opinions of just about everybody in America. Mine included.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2017, 05:18 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,327 posts, read 47,069,940 times
Reputation: 34089
Quote:
Originally Posted by ditchoc View Post
So what happens to the 15 transgender soilders currently in the military?
They pay their way for surgery? Just a guess. Sounds like we are done paying for free addadictomies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2017, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Virginia
10,095 posts, read 6,439,011 times
Reputation: 27662
For all those who think that banning transgenders from serving in the military is a great cost-saving measure, consider that according to a study by Military Times, the U.S. military spends $84 million annually for erectile dysfunction medications. I don't know about you, but I don't see why "I" have to pay taxes so a soldier or a sailor can get or maintain a stiffie. How does that contribute to military readiness?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2017, 05:19 PM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,126 posts, read 16,167,528 times
Reputation: 28335
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbcmh81 View Post
Hormones aren't required daily, though, and it's not some medication that without it causes some kind of medical crisis, so I'm not sure what you're talking about. Even if they had to be taken daily, any soldier has the capability of swallowing a pill. That doesn't exactly take a doctor or special skills.

And you're all still missing the point. The military was working on rules for this. There would've been denials and admissions based on individual cases, but at least some trans people could serve. The fact that thousands already do shows that it is reasonably possible, and the majority of them don't even go through transition during their service anyway. And if any issues ever did arise during service, there was nothing to prevent them from being discharged later on like with any other demographic.
Uhm, not sure where you are getting your medical info, but yes, they do need the hormones once started or it will cause all kinds of physical, emotional, and psychological issues during the time period while their body readjusts. It has nothing to do with the capacity to take a pill, it has to do with what happens if the pill can't be given to them to take.

I am not missing the point. Military service is not about the right to a job.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2017, 05:19 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,914,310 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by skins_fan82 View Post
The opinion of this 34 year veteran outweighs the opinions of just about everybody in America. Mine included.
I agree. It's obviously possible. It's too bad our President disagrees with people who have served for decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2017, 05:19 PM
 
16,345 posts, read 18,071,077 times
Reputation: 7879
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
There are a lot of active duty military service men and women have been processed out for the exact same reason (medical readiness.)

Why is this a discrimination issue?!

If you need to take meds on daily basis for a pre existing condition, then you shouldn't be serving.
If there were good enough to serve yesterday, they should still be good enough to serve today.
The fact that you and other continue to insist that this is the same as treating some kind of disease is baffling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2017, 05:21 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,230 posts, read 27,618,080 times
Reputation: 16073
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1 View Post
In all fairness, this is going to have to be addressed. They actively sought some of these individuals to come out in the open to start the process of preparing the leaders for the change. These people were living and serving as their biological gender, some with the anticipation of transitioning once they left the service. These were stellar service members and they spent a great deal time speaking to leadership groups. I happen to be friend's with one's wife. (And, contrary to all the flap about swinging penises in group showers, all the ones we are aware of are FtM, not MtF). This particular service member is a Navy Captain. At any rate, the service member has, with official encouragement, started the transition but would have never done so otherwise. It would not be fair to this service member to now be run out. There will need to be some type of waivers for these folks. Yeah, if they keep on the hormones they will be non-deployable, but for this limited group, because they are in a very unique situation not of their own making, they need to be waivered until retirement, at minimum. My friend's spouse is prepared to suspend treatment until retirement, serve as they originally were doing then transition after retirement, and I fully support that.
I think if they do not take hormones or have a sex change operation, there’s no reason they cannot serve.

To serve openly however is, probably at the expense of the US government who’ll be forced to pay for those treatments and sex change operations and psychological counseling that comes with all of that.


Once they are active duty and serving openly, the military cannot just stop their treatment. I guarantee you the same people would say it is cruel and inhumane to stop their treatment when they really need it.

Allowing certain group of people with chronic illness to serve will create a lot of potential problems for the military. The sad truth is that many doctors are not really expert in this field. Who knows when these people need treatment all of sudden?! Some Pre-existing conditions can be aggravated by military service alone. Who to say this is not one of them?

I say let's make it simple. If you need meds on daily basis, if the doctors say you have a chronic pre-existing condition, then don't serve.

If you are already serving and you need meds on daily basis, then don't cry if military process you out. Many people have been processed out for the exact same reasons.

There is nothing discriminatory about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2017, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,230 posts, read 27,618,080 times
Reputation: 16073
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbcmh81 View Post
If there were good enough to serve yesterday, they should still be good enough to serve today.
The fact that you and other continue to insist that this is the same as treating some kind of disease is baffling.
The first paragraph is naive to say the least.

My friend was good enough to serve yesterday, today, he is processed out because he is diagnosed with a chronic illness (Rheumatoid Arthritis)

If the transgender did not need to take meds yesterday, he needs to take meds today, everyday, or every other day, for at least three months, then yes, he should be processed out.

It is a simple concept.

Last edited by lilyflower3191981; 07-26-2017 at 05:32 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2017, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Austin TX
11,027 posts, read 6,510,294 times
Reputation: 13259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1 View Post
Uhm, not sure where you are getting your medical info, but yes, they do need the hormones once started or it will cause all kinds of physical, emotional, and psychological issues during the time period while their body readjusts. It has nothing to do with the capacity to take a pill, it has to do with what happens if the pill can't be given to them to take.

I am not missing the point. Military service is not about the right to a job.
I'm glad I'm not the only one here who notices the vast amount of misinformation that some posters will so casually throw out. This guy knows nothing about HRT. That much is obvious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top