Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-21-2017, 01:54 PM
 
8,498 posts, read 4,561,677 times
Reputation: 9754

Advertisements

She was very well connected to those in power in Russia. So were the former counter intelligence Russian army officer and the aide to the Russian oligarch/Putin friend that came along with her to the meeting.

Did anyone else catch how she got the front row seat at the congressional hearing on capitol hill? She was a guest of the spouse of a Trump campaign official.


The husband of the former Florida chair of the Trump campaign obtained a front-row seat to a June 2016 House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing for Natalia Veselnitskaya, the Russian attorney who had met with Donald Trump Jr. at Trump Tower eight days prior. Lanny Wiles, the husband of former Florida campaign chair Susie Wiles, saved the prominent seat for Veselnitskaya at the June 14 hearing on “U.S. Policy Toward Putin’s Russia,” ABC News has confirmed.”

https://theintellectualist.co/spouse...ional-hearing/

Last edited by MMS02760; 07-21-2017 at 02:02 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-21-2017, 01:54 PM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by vacoder View Post
You should ask Dana Rohrabacher, the republican from California. He was the one that arranged for her to attend the congressional meeting on US-Russia relations. Or perhaps Trump's Florida campaign manager as it was her husband secured the front an center seat at the congressional meeting for the Russian lawyer.

P.S. The Lynch pardon parole that ended in Feb 2016 was requested by a federal judge presiding over a money laundering case.
Neither Lynch nor DOJ had anything to do with this.

My understanding was that it State Dept and Homeland Security. This was explained in an earlier post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2017, 01:56 PM
 
9,742 posts, read 4,495,432 times
Reputation: 3981
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Neither Lynch nor DOJ had anything to do with this.

My understanding was that it State Dept and Homeland Security. This was explained in an earlier post.
Yes. Her latest visa was through state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2017, 01:57 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by vacoder View Post
You should ask Dana Rohrabacher, the republican from California. He was the one that arranged for her to attend the congressional meeting on US-Russia relations. Or perhaps Trump's Florida campaign manager as it was her husband secured the front an center seat at the congressional meeting for the Russian lawyer.
She was already in the US. In June 2016, even though she was ineligible for a visa to enter the country.

So... The question remains... Exactly WHY and HOW did Loretta Lynch or someone else in the Obama Admin let her into the US in June 2016? Hmmm...???

Quote:
P.S. The Lynch pardon parole that ended in Feb 2016 was requested by a federal judge presiding over a money laundering case.
Lynch had to approve it, by Federal Law:

Section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Title 8, United States Code, Section 1182(d)(5): provides authority to the Attorney General to parole aliens otherwise ineligible for a visa into the United States.

Why did Lynch approve the lawyer's presence in the US in June 2016? For WHAT purpose?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top