Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Nobody on the left sides with Kim. The issue is a PRESIDENT OF THE USA getting into a juvenile war of words with a petty dictator that may lead to a hot war possibly with nuclear weapons. Why is Trump egging this guy on? Explain what is to be gained by Trump?
It is a game of ego that may result in war. Trump should know better. Think about it.
The issue is clear. Do we stop Un now, or wait until he holds the whole world hostage?
Yes and Trump is busy this morning tweeting more insults at KJU. He has escalated this situation to new and unsafe heights.
This was everyone's fear when he was elected. We saw his juvenile name calling throughout this election as well as his stupid and inane tweets. He promised he would be more presidential.
And, yet here we are, our senile Dear Leader in a juvenile war of words with the crazy leader of NK.
Just what we feared.
If Trump were anywhere near as reckless as you and others suggest, he would've nuked North Korea on Jan 20th. I'd say he's exercised quite a lot of restraint.
Too bad Hitler didn't face some counter-bullies earlier on in his reign.
Today's left would've LOVED Adolph Hitler. They adore dictators and absolute power. No religion, freedom of speech as long as it supports the Reich, snitching on and violence is encouraged against those in disfavor of the Reich, no guns, what's not for the leftist to love?
If Trump were anywhere near as reckless as you and others suggest, he would've nuked North Korea on Jan 20th. I'd say he's exercised quite a lot of restraint.
And kill all of the South Koreans and US soldiers in the strike???¿? He may be a Dotard but he isn't Ramsey Bolton from Game of Thrones..... We don't Nuke our own soldiers and allies. I suggest you buy a map of the world.
The issue is clear. Do we stop Un now, or wait until he holds the whole world hostage?
He's always held the world hostage. His location has always meant that engaging militarily would result in hundreds of thousands, if not millions, dead. There never were any good or easy solutions, that's why the only tactic ever tried has been diplomacy.
Today's left would've LOVED Adolph Hitler. They adore dictators and absolute power. No religion, freedom of speech as long as it supports the Reich, snitching on and violence is encouraged against those in disfavor of the Reich, no guns, what's not for the leftist to love?
Today's right loves Russia and Putin ..... Drops Mic.
He's quickly becoming one. The idea, if we are to pay attention to the lessons of history, is to stop him BEFORE he becomes a world wide threatening nuclear power.
He's always held the world hostage. His location has always meant that engaging militarily would result in hundreds of thousands, if not millions, dead. There never were any good or easy solutions, that's why the only tactic ever tried has been diplomacy.
Some of us here on CD want to watch millions of people die on National TV while they crack a beer and eat chips . They are cowards who can't find the Korean Peninsula on a map.....
What country has Kim Jung Un attacked? How may people outside his own country has he killed?
Should we wait until millions are killed by nuclear weapons before doing something? Has history taught us anything, RE: Adolph Hitler?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.