Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Twin Falls Idaho
4,996 posts, read 2,442,962 times
Reputation: 2540

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by amenalot View Post
^ Zilch? Read Comey's findings last year, he found enough to indict her but chose not to because she didn't have "intent" (despite intent not being a criteria).
Research mens rea.

 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:32 AM
 
10,726 posts, read 4,334,730 times
Reputation: 5797
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Zilch. Read Comey's statement. No prosecutor would have filed charges. There is no evidence that any of the information handled by her personal server ever ended up in any illicit hands, she didn't have any intent to compromise information. Your desire to prosecute is based on your animosity, not on any real damage.
"No presoecuter would have filed charges" because Comey just destroyed their case.
The FBI clearing Hillary is a huge advantage for Hillary's defense team.
But Comey is no longer FBI director.
So if this case is re-opened, and the next FBI director doesn't use the excuse of "no intent", then its very easy to charge her.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlow View Post
So why hasn't Jeff Sessions indicted her?
Hillary's defense team can use Comey's words as a defense.
Sessions would need the new FBI director to re-open the case.
 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:34 AM
 
18,984 posts, read 9,067,948 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilEyeFleegle View Post
Research mens rea.
Thanks! I love it when someone makes me go look something up and I learn something new. I would rep you if I could.

This will, of course, go right over the heads of those it was aimed at because they simply do not want to hear anything that disturbs their narrative.
 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:42 AM
 
16,579 posts, read 20,700,000 times
Reputation: 26860
Quote:
Originally Posted by amenalot View Post
"No presoecuter would have filed charges" because Comey just destroyed their case.
The FBI clearing Hillary is a huge advantage for Hillary's defense team.
But Comey is no longer FBI director.
So if this case is re-opened, and the next FBI director doesn't use the excuse of "no intent", then its very easy to charge her.



Hillary's defense team can use Comey's words as a defense.
Sessions would need the new FBI director to re-open the case.
So why hasn't that happened if she's such a horrible criminal and there's a new FBI director and it's so easy to charge her?
 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:47 AM
 
10,726 posts, read 4,334,730 times
Reputation: 5797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlow View Post
So why hasn't that happened if she's such a horrible criminal and there's a new FBI director and it's so easy to charge her?
The new FBI director hasn't been there for long, and we don't know what investigations are being conducted anyway (they aren't supposed to be made public).
The new FBI director probably isn't a grandstander.
 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:48 AM
 
18,984 posts, read 9,067,948 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlow View Post
So why hasn't that happened if she's such a horrible criminal and there's a new FBI director and it's so easy to charge her?
That's the million dollar question that you will never get an answer to. Because we--and deep down they--all know the answer already.

Quote:
Originally Posted by amenalot View Post
The new FBI director hasn't been there for long, and we don't know what investigations are being conducted anyway (they aren't supposed to be made public).
Lame. If it's such a slam-dunk why wouldn't he get it out there right away? He's certainly been there long enough to do so. I mean, if it's truly that egregious...
 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:53 AM
 
10,726 posts, read 4,334,730 times
Reputation: 5797
Get it out there? No, that's Comey's drama queen grandstanding thing.
FBI investigations aren't normally for public show.
And you have no idea what FBI investigations are currently taking place.
 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:57 AM
 
8,060 posts, read 3,942,643 times
Reputation: 5356
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilEyeFleegle View Post
Research mens rea.

Mens rea my ass:

Sailor Denied 'Clinton Deal', Gets 1 Year in Prison for 6 Photos of Sub

Petraeus pleads guilty to mishandling classified material, will face probation
 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:57 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,864,851 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by amenalot View Post
"No presoecuter would have filed charges" because Comey just destroyed their case.
The FBI clearing Hillary is a huge advantage for Hillary's defense team.
But Comey is no longer FBI director.
So if this case is re-opened, and the next FBI director doesn't use the excuse of "no intent", then its very easy to charge her.



Hillary's defense team can use Comey's words as a defense.
Sessions would need the new FBI director to re-open the case.
They're not going to find anything new. There were no harmful outcomes from her reckless behavior. Even if she were prosecuted, it's doubtful any judge would sentence her to jail time given that there were no harmful outcomes. And it would be up to a judge, because finding jurors who weren't biased would be impossible.
 
Old 09-19-2017, 10:59 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,864,851 times
Reputation: 14345
They intended to pass information on to persons who weren't cleared for that information.

Clinton didn't.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top