Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
^ Zilch? Read Comey's findings last year, he found enough to indict her but chose not to because she didn't have "intent" (despite intent not being a criteria).
Zilch. Read Comey's statement. No prosecutor would have filed charges. There is no evidence that any of the information handled by her personal server ever ended up in any illicit hands, she didn't have any intent to compromise information. Your desire to prosecute is based on your animosity, not on any real damage.
"No presoecuter would have filed charges" because Comey just destroyed their case.
The FBI clearing Hillary is a huge advantage for Hillary's defense team.
But Comey is no longer FBI director.
So if this case is re-opened, and the next FBI director doesn't use the excuse of "no intent", then its very easy to charge her.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlow
So why hasn't Jeff Sessions indicted her?
Hillary's defense team can use Comey's words as a defense.
Sessions would need the new FBI director to re-open the case.
"No presoecuter would have filed charges" because Comey just destroyed their case.
The FBI clearing Hillary is a huge advantage for Hillary's defense team.
But Comey is no longer FBI director.
So if this case is re-opened, and the next FBI director doesn't use the excuse of "no intent", then its very easy to charge her.
Hillary's defense team can use Comey's words as a defense.
Sessions would need the new FBI director to re-open the case.
So why hasn't that happened if she's such a horrible criminal and there's a new FBI director and it's so easy to charge her?
So why hasn't that happened if she's such a horrible criminal and there's a new FBI director and it's so easy to charge her?
The new FBI director hasn't been there for long, and we don't know what investigations are being conducted anyway (they aren't supposed to be made public).
The new FBI director probably isn't a grandstander.
So why hasn't that happened if she's such a horrible criminal and there's a new FBI director and it's so easy to charge her?
That's the million dollar question that you will never get an answer to. Because we--and deep down they--all know the answer already.
Quote:
Originally Posted by amenalot
The new FBI director hasn't been there for long, and we don't know what investigations are being conducted anyway (they aren't supposed to be made public).
Lame. If it's such a slam-dunk why wouldn't he get it out there right away? He's certainly been there long enough to do so. I mean, if it's truly that egregious...
Get it out there? No, that's Comey's drama queen grandstanding thing.
FBI investigations aren't normally for public show.
And you have no idea what FBI investigations are currently taking place.
"No presoecuter would have filed charges" because Comey just destroyed their case.
The FBI clearing Hillary is a huge advantage for Hillary's defense team.
But Comey is no longer FBI director.
So if this case is re-opened, and the next FBI director doesn't use the excuse of "no intent", then its very easy to charge her.
Hillary's defense team can use Comey's words as a defense.
Sessions would need the new FBI director to re-open the case.
They're not going to find anything new. There were no harmful outcomes from her reckless behavior. Even if she were prosecuted, it's doubtful any judge would sentence her to jail time given that there were no harmful outcomes. And it would be up to a judge, because finding jurors who weren't biased would be impossible.
They intended to pass information on to persons who weren't cleared for that information.
Clinton didn't.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.