Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
my wife did while I was watching football in the other room and I read all the reports online about the show .....and she is not political, she is pretty much independent as a voter and even she was disgusted by the award show and their political propaganda and the bashing and disrespect of a sitting President.
The press was definitely tipped in Trump's favor because his campaign generated ratings. He received more press in the primaries than the other 14 GOP candidates combined. After he was elected, they realized they created a monster, which is why they're overcompensating now in their criticism of him. Beginning with the hosts of Morning Joe...
The media is neither "for" nor "against" anyone. The media will promote whatever stories generate the most advertising revenue. In the end, the media is a business, and the first order of business is to maximize profits. Trump, being entertaining and provocative, was good for ratings. Thus coverage of Trump.
Yes, there were calls by liberal (and sometimes not so liberal) individual journalists and commentators to cease reporting on Trump. How did that work out? The Washington Post at one point had its press-credentials revoked by the Trump campaign. Did they cease following the campaign? If the media were decidedly anti-Trump, its various organs would have collaborated on a complete news blackout. Trump rally? Never happened. Trump speech? Never given. Trump campaign stop? Passed us by. Trump tweet? Deleted before we noticed it. And so forth. But that's not what happened, is it?
Go look in mirror. The topic is about Hillary Clinton. You have not made one post about that.
I get why you get angry, but this topic isn't about the people of CD.
Which is the point, that continually escapes you, because you're too busy deflecting.
Again. I have nothing to be "angry" about. I'm not the one starting thread after thread about Hillary.
It's pretty obvious some of you are quite angry that "Crooked Hillary" (remember that?) isn't in jail ("Lock her up!!!" - remember that?) and is making money and getting pub as a free woman.
And the more you talk about her, the more she'll probably make. And that just burns some of you up.
Pointing how hyprocrites and offering friendly advice. If you don't want to take it, that's your prerogative.
And I like looking in the mirror.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FC76-81
Exactly. These blow-hard Hillary people are hella angry. Look at their Hollywood award show. It was nothing but a bunch of angry Dem Lib entertainers devoting their entire pathetic show on anti-Trump sediments.
Lol, I'm not pro-anything Hillary. Or a "lib". And I don't watch award shows or "bits and pieces" of it, like you.
Again. I have nothing to be "angry" about. I'm not the one starting thread after thread about Hillary.
You are angry. You have bashed everyone in the topic starting with the "Nobody Cares".
Hillary lost. Trump won. Time to put on the big boy pants and move on.
This topic is about Hillary Clinton's blame tour including her blaming her loss on the media. As long as Hillary puts herself out there, then there will be topics about her.
The media isn't why Hillary lost. She lost because she was a hilariously bad candidate. Not only did she lose to Trump in what was one of the biggest political upsets of the modern times, but she also lost to a no name Senator from Ill. That in a race with all the rules rigged for her.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.