Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-27-2017, 07:36 AM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
4,944 posts, read 2,949,070 times
Reputation: 3805

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Was Manifest Destiny part of the "limited government"? The government was heavily involved in expanding the frontier, waging wars against the natives, build railways and grant land to settlers.
From our standard it would appear to be libertarian because the government was quite small and regulations and safety nets almost non existent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2017, 07:38 AM
 
45,261 posts, read 26,518,839 times
Reputation: 25017
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Welfare has to be compulsory, since most people are stupid and selfish, the same reason we have Social Security, since the vast majority can't save to spare their lives
You shouldnt be so hard on yourself and we have SS because it gave the politicians a great pool of wealth to dip into, while making people further dependent on the mothership
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 07:38 AM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,983,373 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Obama's jobs czar was one of the biggest exporters of jobs around. Libertarians were against the bail outs. The lower classes would be better off today without them.
I dont think anyone seriously believes that libertarianism is good for the poor? Maybe in some blogs and among libertarian "think tanks" but thats just an attempt to give it wider appeal than than the people who would benefit, the top 0.1%. Cant win elections with 0.1% of the vote so its important to try to dupe the masses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 07:39 AM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,983,373 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by BornintheSprings View Post
From our standard it would appear to be libertarian because the government was quite small and regulations and safety nets almost non existent.
By that logic, the Congo and other central African countries are libertarian. Very weak and small government, very little regulations and no safety net.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 07:40 AM
 
14,011 posts, read 5,658,173 times
Reputation: 8662
Quote:
Originally Posted by BornintheSprings View Post
The US was mostly a libertarian country until the 1930s.
No it wasn't. It wasn't even close. It may have been closer than it is now, since now we live in a full blown Fabian socialist welfare state instead of just 90% of one, but there was no point since the convention to create a strong central government that this country was anywhere close to libertarian. Believe me, plenty of libertarians get this wrong too, and I am not just talking about slavery and tariffs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 07:41 AM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
4,944 posts, read 2,949,070 times
Reputation: 3805
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
By that logic, the Congo and other central African countries are libertarian. Very weak and small government, very little regulations and no safety net.
I would argue thats what a libertarian country would come to resemble given time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 07:42 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,304,530 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
I dont think anyone seriously believes that libertarianism is good for the poor? Maybe in some blogs and among libertarian "think tanks" but thats just an attempt to give it wider appeal than than the people who would benefit, the top 0.1%. Cant win elections with 0.1% of the vote so its important to try to dupe the masses.
The Republicans were for the bail outs. The Democrats were for the bail outs. The Libertarians were against the bail outs. The bail outs hurt the poor.

Is that simplistic and a generalization. Yes. Can anyone make an argument for many different things? Absolutely. In that example I side with the Libertarians.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 07:43 AM
 
45,261 posts, read 26,518,839 times
Reputation: 25017
Quote:
Originally Posted by BornintheSprings View Post
I would argue thats what a libertarian country would come to resemble given time.
Because without helicopter govt you will become a savage?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 07:45 AM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
4,944 posts, read 2,949,070 times
Reputation: 3805
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Because without helicopter govt you will become a savage?
No just neglect the poor defund education give the wealthy unchecked power and slowly the country will deteriorate. Poverty in the US is kept in check by government programs do you really want to live in a country where people will just starve to death if they lose a job? Crime will spike crime is bad for the economy. Lots of things people like you don't even consider when you advocate for a libertarian style state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 07:45 AM
 
14,011 posts, read 5,658,173 times
Reputation: 8662
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Libertarians don't give a crap about the poor or helping them, and Republicans don't either. They both think that if you are poor that it's your own fault, even if you work hard and are still poor
Democrats don't give a crap about the poor or helping them either. If they gave a crap, they'd volunteer their own money instead of volunteering everyone else's.

There is exactly zero virtue in promising to take from others in the name of whatever. Saying there is no amount of other people's money you are not willing to spend does not make you generous, it makes you an accessory to theft...at best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top