Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-02-2017, 12:49 PM
 
17,501 posts, read 9,319,173 times
Reputation: 11960

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
Exactly. If you take away the exemptions and double the standard deduction the difference is small. Then you get rid of all the deductions that mid and upper middle income people benefit from. They increase the child credit (which may be income limited anyway) but take away credits for your kids in college. This is a total screw over of affluent middle class people who are have good jobs, nice homes and more than one kid for the benefit of the billionaire class.
Please quote the section that "takes away credits for your kids in college".

Tax Reform Bill

Thanks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-02-2017, 12:50 PM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,122 posts, read 51,371,476 times
Reputation: 28360
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
This is where I disagree. People who have children should be paying MORE in taxes, not less.
Many of them will be under this proposal. It will hit large families hard because of the loss of $4000 for each child in exemptions. The increased child credit will not offset that assuming that they make little enough to even qualify for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2017, 12:51 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,673,766 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
first amendment right to speak..

Maybe you should be upset it costs millions to begin with..
Supply and demand, only three ways to lower home prices in high cost areas, A.force people to leave, B.kill the economy, or C.build more apartments
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2017, 12:51 PM
 
1,400 posts, read 867,778 times
Reputation: 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by treasurefinder View Post
Sorry folks making 150k-250k are not wealthy. This is a tax increase for us.
In that range you will still see a reduced tax burden, 12% up to 90k, and 25% to 260k. The rates are lower and the brackets have been expanded so that the rates apply to higher income ranges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2017, 12:52 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,685,145 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
Many of them will be under this proposal. It will hit large families hard because of the loss of $4000 for each child in exemptions. The increased child credit will not offset that assuming that they make little enough to even qualify for it.
Raise state and local corporate taxes and rebate the money back.

SIMPLE!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2017, 12:54 PM
 
20,821 posts, read 8,652,273 times
Reputation: 14456
Why would anyone think everyone will be happy with everything in the new tax bill? Were we all happy with everything in the old tax bill? Just worry about yourselves. I will pay less so I am happy and I am far from rich. Of course, with my luck, once the bill passes, I will win the Powerball and pay a bloody fortune!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2017, 12:55 PM
 
5,731 posts, read 2,203,855 times
Reputation: 3877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
Please quote the section that "takes away credits for your kids in college".

Tax Reform Bill

Thanks
Yes please show us that part
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2017, 12:56 PM
 
3,569 posts, read 2,530,401 times
Reputation: 2290
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastwardBound View Post
The current rate is 25% for married couples at $75,900. Raising it to $90,000 is an improvement.
Okay, let's take a look:
New individual tax brackets:
12%: <$45,000 individual, $90,000 couple.
25%: $45,000-200,000 individual and $90,000-260,000 couple.
35%: $200,000-$500,000 individual and $260,000-1,000,000 million couple.
39.6%: $500,000+ individual and $1,000,000+ couple.

Old individual tax brackets:
10%: <$9,325 individual, $18,650 couple.

15%: $9,325-37,950 individual, $18,650-75,900 couple
25%: $37,950-91,900 individual, 75,900-153,100 couple
28%: $91,900-191,650 individual, $153,100-233,350 couple
33%: $191,650-416,700 individual, $233,350-416,700 couple
35%: 416,700-418,400 individual, $416,700-470,700 couple
39.6%: 418,400+ individual, $470,700+ couple

Let's say you are a childless couple making $150k. You pay an effective 6% state income tax ($9k), $12k property tax, and $18k mortgage interest.

Under current law, you itemize & get two personal exemptions:
Exemptions: $8,100
Itemized deductions: $39,000

Taxable income is $150k less $47,100: $102,900
You pay 17,202.50 in federal taxes.

Under the R proposal, you take a standard deduction and have no exemptions: $24,000

Your taxable income is $126,000. You pay 10,800 on the first $90k & $9k on the next 36,000. Your federal tax bill just rose to 19,800--an increase of ~$2,600. If you have children, or deductible education expenses, student loan interest, deductible medical expenses, or other eliminated breaks: this bill further increases your taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2017, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,122 posts, read 51,371,476 times
Reputation: 28360
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1grin_g0 View Post
In that range you will still see a reduced tax burden, 12% up to 90k, and 25% to 260k. The rates are lower and the brackets have been expanded so that the rates apply to higher income ranges.
But exemptions are gone and deductions that we use are eliminated. The lower marginal rates do not make up for that and the net result is a really big increase - thousands of dollars per year on this income group ($120ish - $200K). In time, this will probably come out in the analyses. People in this income group are largely suburban Republicans, so we will see how this ends up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2017, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Austin
15,665 posts, read 10,439,676 times
Reputation: 19584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metsfan53 View Post
you realize that's not the case right? And as a Texan you might get hit too here?
As a former New Yorker of 25 years, it IS the case. This tax proposal is good for the middle class, quite good for corporations, but really nails people in high state taxed and high property priced blue states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top