Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Absolutely. Wikileaks claims to be so impartial and transparent. We now know they were working directly with the Trump campaign.
Assange should have targeted corruption in both parties and his beloved Wikileaks might still be credible.
Credible? pull-EEZ!
The intel agencies have ID'd wikileaks as an agency of the Russian GRU.
From Republican CIA chief Pompeo:
"It is time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is," he said, "a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia. In January of this year, our Intelligence Community determined that Russian military intelligence — the GRU — had used WikiLeaks to release data of U.S. victims that the GRU had obtained through cyber operations against the Democratic National Committee. And the report also found that Russia's primary propaganda outlet, RT, has actively collaborated with WikiLeaks."
You have to think that Assange reached out to Trump because Trump was an outsider to DC and the GOP and therefore more likely to be receptive to utilize the dirt they had on Hillary. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Assange probably had little more trust in the GOP than he did the DNC. And the stuff he has on Hillary..... oh, my.
This implicates Trump too, because 15 mins after one of the Wikileaks emails to Don Jr. about some big stuff coming out, Trump said on the campaign, "Keep an eye on wikileaks. Something big is about to come out." Meaning Don Jr. told Trump Sr. about these communications.
Trump and his entire campaign team are going down. Absolutely no way to justify these actions.
I have been waiting for this, as others have. I would like to see Don Jr. on the stand, would be more of "not recalling events", I'm sure. What's funny is, Frump giving these little clues that have to do with his own doing. (I recall his buddy Guiliani making references before the election.."that something was about to happen", while smiling and rubbing his hands together. I don't know where he has been lately, but he is one of the sneaky ones). Just waiting for Dump to make reference to that big night at the Russian Hotel...
You have to think that Assange reached out to Trump because Trump was an outsider to DC and the GOP and therefore more likely to be receptive to utilize the dirt they had on Hillary. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Assange probably had little more trust in the GOP than he did the DNC. And the stuff he has on Hillary..... oh, my.
all of that argues against assange being an impartial observer. and lets not forget assanges offer to trump to publish cherry-picked tax returns to make it appear that wikileaks/assange was impartial.
i used to have mixed feelings about assange but could respect the concept of working toward transparency. assange has destroyed that ( ironically because of leaked documents ).
The intel agencies have ID'd wikileaks as an agency of the Russian GRU.
From Republican CIA chief Pompeo:
"It is time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is," he said, "a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia. In January of this year, our Intelligence Community determined that Russian military intelligence — the GRU — had used WikiLeaks to release data of U.S. victims that the GRU had obtained through cyber operations against the Democratic National Committee. And the report also found that Russia's primary propaganda outlet, RT, has actively collaborated with WikiLeaks."
What is the proof behind this claim? I'm not taking the CIA or FBI at their word. I didn't trust them when Bush was in office, I didn't trust them under Obama and I don't trust them under Trump.
all of that argues against assange being an impartial observer. and lets not forget assanges offer to trump to publish cherry-picked tax returns to make it appear that wikileaks/assange was impartial.
i used to have mixed feelings about assange but could respect the concept of working toward transparency. assange has destroyed that ( ironically because of leaked documents ).
Don't like it when they're exposing your side huh?
Don't like it when they're exposing your side huh?
who's side?
i was specifically addressing assange/wikileaks being an impartial observer. if he's taken a side then, by definition, he is no longer an impartial observer.
“I believe in our intel agencies, our intelligence agencies ... as currently led by fine people, I believe very much in our intelligence agencies.”
-Donald Trump
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What's funny is, Frump giving these little clues that have to do with his own doing. (I recall his buddy Guiliani making references before the election.."that something was about to happen", while smiling and rubbing his hands together. I don't know where he has been lately, but he is one of the sneaky ones). Just waiting for Dump to make reference to that big night at the Russian Hotel...
