Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-03-2017, 12:50 PM
 
Location: The 719
18,022 posts, read 27,468,060 times
Reputation: 17342

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
People?

We are talking about ABC News which published a fake made up story about the sitting US President, over the exclusive use public airwaves that it is licensed to use. And that made up story had a huge impact on the US Stock Market. IMO, they have exposed themselves to legal liability for what they did.

Now if ABC wants to turn itself into a tabloid blog, then I'm fine with that. But first they must give up their broadcast licenses and ownership or affiliation of TV stations across the United States.
This.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-03-2017, 12:53 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rambler123 View Post
Get educated:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_...8.E2.80.932009

Last I checked, October of 2008 was still before January of 2009.

It's sad that I've joked about this attempt to blame the crash of 2008 on Obama before on this forum, and now we have an example of somebody actually doing that, lol.

Next thing ya know someone will be claiming that the New York Times is Mexican owned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,601,522 times
Reputation: 7801
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
Causing the stock market do nosedive due to partisan faulty reporting is worth more than 4 weeks suspended. What ABC did was give the guy an extended holiday vacation: Chanukah, Christmas, New Year's.

I think it's more serious than Matt Lauer pinching Katie Couric's butt.
You forgot Kwanza!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
And yet, the head of Enron was put in prison ...
Actually he died of a heart attack or if you are a conspiracy theorist, he faked his death and living on an island somewhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 01:06 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
People?

We are talking about ABC News which published a fake made up story about the sitting US President, over the exclusive use public airwaves that it is licensed to use. And that made up story had a huge impact on the US Stock Market. IMO, they have exposed themselves to legal liability for what they did.
Please, stop the biased hyperbole! A less than 1% change in the market is hardly a "huge impact" as you allege and is well within the norm of a 'normal trading day. And you're talking about a sitting US President who's made up more than his share of fake news including phony phone calls and unsubstantiated accusations of wire-tapping.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 01:16 PM
 
10,764 posts, read 4,346,172 times
Reputation: 5828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rambler123 View Post
Having a loud mouth and a horrible ego does not make one a leader.

And before becoming president, Trump was a sub-par businessman who lost money and businesses regularly, destroyed most everything he touched, and was the butt of every joke involving pampered, worthless, spoiled rich brats who never earned a dime in their life.

It is only because he ran as a Republican that we now have millions of partisan suckers supporting this brain-dead clod who, 2 years ago, they wouldn't have entrusted with their retirement fund, house for a weekend, or daughter for one night.

Trump is a loud-mouthed stooge. If we can sue people for lowering the market, can we sue him when his disastrous policies topple the economy?
Actually before becoming President, Trump was the most iconic and well-known businessman of the last 30 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 01:16 PM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,095,474 times
Reputation: 9726
So who loses money due to a one day dip in the stock market? Day traders? And I should care about day traders exactly why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 01:18 PM
 
10,764 posts, read 4,346,172 times
Reputation: 5828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rambler123 View Post
Because the market hates uncertainty. Trump is worthless. He hasn't done a single thing of any value for any working class Americans in this nation, save for the ones who get their kicks out of spewing bigotry and who no doubt enjoy his half-arse travel ban and his obvious support of white supremacists in places like Charlottesville.

The economy is still riding on the coat-tails of the Obama recovery - although, to be honest, even Obama didn't work any miracles there. The only reason it dips when Trump is in trouble or proposes some mind-boggling stupid idea is because the market hates uncertainty, not because the market needs Trump to succeed somehow.

If Trump literally did nothing the rest of his time in office - and found a way to avoid being impeached or otherwise legally dealt with for obstruction of justice, etc. - the market would have a much better day simple because uncertainty over that lunatic's actions and if he will still be the president or not will be removed.

Don't confuse fear of the unknown with fear of a specific person failing. Trump is worthless, and the only reason the market HAS continued to do so well is because Trump has failed to implement most of his idiotic ideas thus far, with the unfortunate "low introductory rates" pay-day loan style tax scam being the near-term exception.
Trump removed almost all of Obama's mistakes, all those Obama regulations that were hurting the business world have been removed.
Its like Obama never existed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 01:22 PM
 
4,559 posts, read 1,436,942 times
Reputation: 1919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
If Trump has had "no effect" on the stock market and the economy has been riding on Obama's coat tails, then how come it nosedived when we thought Trump was in trouble?

Huh?..... Huh?.... Huh?

Cause Trump is POTUS to make rich people richer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 01:22 PM
 
Location: moved
13,656 posts, read 9,714,475 times
Reputation: 23481
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
The stock market crashed in 2009 when Obama was President. That is what was stated.
Obama took office on January 20, 2009. The stock market bottomed on March 9, 2009. What actions would Obama have had time to have taken in the intervening 7 weeks? After March 9, 2009, the market recovered handsomely - and then some.

So... by your narrative, 7 weeks of Obama is responsible for the market crash, but 8 years of Obama had nothing to do with the stock market's rise?

We can - tangentially - blame Obama's policies for insufficiently helping those persons who don't own stock. There's a case to be made, that the policies enacted from January 2009 to January 2017 were ineffective in helping the bottom 80%, or whoever it is, who isn't heavily invested in equities. But now we're blaming Obama for a bad stock market?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 01:26 PM
 
6,675 posts, read 4,278,056 times
Reputation: 8441
Quote:
Originally Posted by McGowdog View Post
The snowflakies got their hopes up for the weekend.

They are still pounding this garbage down their throats this fine weekend.

Poor snowflakies. They don't have much.
Just the truth. But liberals know nothing about that so I understand that’s a foreign concept to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top