Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-06-2017, 07:54 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,555,075 times
Reputation: 29289

Advertisements

sounds like she has some 'issues'..

Quote:
A female police captain in Indiana has been placed on administrative leave after telling a colleague he benefited from "white male privilege." During a Nov. 1 training session on the treatment of transgender people, an unidentified male officer with the Plainfield Police Department questioned a statistic suggesting that transgender people are three times more likely to experience police violence than others. "Most of the people that I know have never been, accused the police of violence … so I guess I don't get where that statistic comes from," the officer is heard saying in a video, per WRTV. Capt. Carri Weber, who is off camera, then says the officer is skeptical "because of your white male privilege."

The male officer asks, "Chief, are you going to let her get away" with the comment he describes as "extremely offensive." He went on to file a complaint on Nov. 10, alleging he was "racially and sexistly slurred" when Weber stated "her discriminatory views," per the Washington Post.
Weber was put on administrative leave Nov. 16 by Plainfield's Board of Commissioners, and a vote on Thursday could decide her future with the department. Weber also got into hot water in August, serving a two-week suspension after getting behind the wheel of a police vehicle after drinking at a golf outing; she also had beer cans in the vehicle.
Female Cop Brings Up 'White Male Privilege,' Is Suspended
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2017, 08:10 AM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,445,026 times
Reputation: 6960
All this feminazi crap going on has empowered many women to think they can be jerks now with full support of society.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 08:26 AM
 
15,063 posts, read 6,175,095 times
Reputation: 5124
Wow...seems overly sensitive. That’s all it took for him to whine to his supervisor.

Last edited by Oldhag1; 12-08-2017 at 09:38 AM.. Reason: Removed deleted quote and direct response to it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 08:46 AM
 
477 posts, read 276,598 times
Reputation: 1316
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReineDeCoeur View Post
Wow...seems overly sensitive. That’s all it took for him to whine to his supervisor.
THAT'S how many men feel every time women complain about pettiness...

I don't believe the male officer truly felt "offended," but he wanted to make a point about how if their roles had been reversed and a male officer had said something about a woman, she would have pounced on it gleefully.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 11:46 AM
 
17,440 posts, read 9,268,656 times
Reputation: 11907
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReineDeCoeur View Post
Wow...seems overly sensitive. That’s all it took for him to whine to his supervisor.
It likely has more to do with the prior charges against this woman ........ that they gave her a slap on the wrist for. She was the Asst Chief of Police and a Major in August when she was drunk driving in a police vehicle with beer cans in the car. She admitted to the violations and got a 2 week suspension without pay.

Plainfield police say assistant chief's suspension makes 'mockery' of alcohol policy |Indy News - August 23, 2017

INDIANAPOLIS -- The assistant chief of Plainfield police is serving a two-week suspension for violating the department’s alcohol policy – but officers under her command say that’s not sufficient.

According to Plainfield Police Department written policy, “no officer shall operate a department vehicle within eight hours of consuming any alcoholic beverage. No officer shall operate a department vehicle or report for duty at any time with a blood alcohol level over .00 percent.”

The policy states there is “zero tolerance” for any officer operating a department vehicle with a BAC over .00 percent, and that violation of the policy is cause for automatic dismissal.

Plainfield officers reached out to Call 6 Investigates after, they said, they felt like they couldn’t speak up within the department.

“We feel our hands are tied because we fear retaliation if we voice our concerns and feelings,” the officers said.


It's more of the Leftist mantra of "Rules are for Thee, not for Me".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 11:59 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,555,075 times
Reputation: 29289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
It likely has more to do with the prior charges against this woman ........ that they gave her a slap on the wrist for. She was the Asst Chief of Police and a Major in August when she was drunk driving in a police vehicle with beer cans in the car. She admitted to the violations and got a 2 week suspension without pay.

Plainfield police say assistant chief's suspension makes 'mockery' of alcohol policy |Indy News - August 23, 2017

INDIANAPOLIS -- The assistant chief of Plainfield police is serving a two-week suspension for violating the department’s alcohol policy – but officers under her command say that’s not sufficient.

According to Plainfield Police Department written policy, “no officer shall operate a department vehicle within eight hours of consuming any alcoholic beverage. No officer shall operate a department vehicle or report for duty at any time with a blood alcohol level over .00 percent.”

The policy states there is “zero tolerance” for any officer operating a department vehicle with a BAC over .00 percent, and that violation of the policy is cause for automatic dismissal.

Plainfield officers reached out to Call 6 Investigates after, they said, they felt like they couldn’t speak up within the department.

“We feel our hands are tied because we fear retaliation if we voice our concerns and feelings,” the officers said.


It's more of the Leftist mantra of "Rules are for Thee, not for Me".
good post. seems like a pattern of poor behavior.

Quote:
“We feel our hands are tied because we fear retaliation if we voice our concerns and feelings,” the officers said.

The officers told Call 6 Investigates that they feel like the assistant chief’s punishment makes a “mockery” of department policies.
---
“I can say the overwhelming feeling from the majority of officers is that she should have been asked to resign.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,600,003 times
Reputation: 7801
What a big snowflake crying to the chief and filing a complaint. Probably went home crying to his mommy too.

Last edited by fitzy24; 12-06-2017 at 12:59 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 12:45 PM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,445,026 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzy24 View Post
What big snowflake crying to the chief and filing a complaint. Probably went home crying to his mommy too.
So is it your belief women are allowed to run their smart mouths at co workers without repercussions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 01:32 PM
 
Location: One of the 13 original colonies.
10,190 posts, read 7,954,135 times
Reputation: 8114
He's not the snowflake... the one that ran her stupid mouth is the liberal snowflake. I'm glad he didn't just sit there and listen to this BS. Enough of this liberal hate for white men and their privilege. If you don't like it too bad.

Last edited by Scotty011; 12-06-2017 at 02:14 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2017, 01:46 PM
 
4,710 posts, read 7,102,284 times
Reputation: 5613
I think both of them are snowflakes. He asked a question. She should have answered it in a way that did not label and accuse him. It would have been pretty easy to do, I think. But the trainee was also pretty thin skinned. He could have simply said "You haven't said where the statistics came from. You answered it by just labeling me. But I would still like more explanation of the numbers."

But if the trainer had other issues on her record, well, that's another matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top