Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-15-2017, 02:33 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,402,706 times
Reputation: 17261

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
On the bold above:

That is the point I was making.
Someone who knows nothing about the law would make better decisions than the liberal activist judges who do. All he would have to do is read the law that clearly gives the president authority on this immigration issue.
The liberal activist judges and Obama himself know the law and think they are smart enough to get around it. Then they get kicked in the butt by the SCOTUS.
You really are unaware arent you?

SCOTUS hasn't decided that yet. They've held that while they do decide, it can continue as Trump wants-but its a complex enough issue that they need time to consider it. (They probably will rule in POTUS's favor however)

Any more nonsense? The laws in question are not nearly as cut and dried as you seem to believe, which is why we need judges that can understand the laws rather then political hacks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-15-2017, 02:35 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,383 posts, read 26,294,968 times
Reputation: 15683
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
On the bold above:

That is the point I was making.
Someone who knows nothing about the law would make better decisions than the liberal activist judges who do. All he would have to do is read the law that clearly gives the president authority on this immigration issue.
The liberal activist judges and Obama himself know the law and think they are smart enough to get around it. Then they get kicked in the butt by the SCOTUS.
What are the decisions that you feel were done incorrectly by these liberal activist judges, Citizens United, Hobby Lobby, Trump University. Maybe you can rattle off a few.


I don't want a cab driver ruling over court decisions, you have been listening to Trump too much. The American people like our justice system, its what separates us from countries like Russia and China.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2017, 02:42 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,917,545 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
I find it helpful to keep it on the level of understanding of the left and that way its not seen as condescending or talking down to them. It is a recommended practice in communications.

Are you familiar with Aesop's Fables. This one is apropos to the topic : The Ass & His Driver

The driver being seen as the conservative or even the constitution hits the mark without question.
No, you're never demeaning.

Aesop's Fables aren't apropos to this topic.

A President of the United States nominated a person to a position that person is not qualified to hold. End of story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2017, 02:50 PM
 
47,010 posts, read 26,056,438 times
Reputation: 29483
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
A President of the United States nominated a person to a position that person is not qualified to hold. End of story.
Well, phma is not going to discuss that, is he now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2017, 02:53 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,685,380 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
You really are unaware arent you?

SCOTUS hasn't decided that yet. They've held that while they do decide, it can continue as Trump wants-but its a complex enough issue that they need time to consider it. (They probably will rule in POTUS's favor however)

Any more nonsense? The laws in question are not nearly as cut and dried as you seem to believe, which is why we need judges that can understand the laws rather then political hacks.
Unaware would be making assumptions about a general comment, not a specific one and not knowing Obama isn't in office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2017, 03:03 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,685,380 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Well, phma is not going to discuss that, is he now?
Actually he is and has been.

Here is the link that proves it. It is easily proven that phma is on target while you are still looking for ammo to load a banana.

Short read of several paragraphs shouldn't strain anyone looking for knowledge.


Qualifications to Become a Federal Judge | Chron.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2017, 03:05 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,402,706 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Actually he is and has been.

Here is the link that proves it. It is easily proven that phma is on target while you are still looking for ammo to load a banana.

Short read of several paragraphs shouldn't strain anyone looking for knowledge.


Qualifications to Become a Federal Judge | Chron.com
I think the fact that you feel like you can defend the person mentioned in this topic says all that needs to be said. His level of incompetence is truly staggering.

You want political appointees that meet your preconceived notions, not actual judges. This sort of nonsense belongs in Russia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2017, 03:15 PM
 
18,323 posts, read 10,692,214 times
Reputation: 8603
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
An Obama prosecutor got by 9-0 the conviction overturned by the Supreme Court!

I guess that one has to learn a lot and is now in serious trouble again!

Democrats are so fast to bash Trump but in the end the Democrats House of Cards is coming down now and it goes faster down then they ever expected!

Supreme Court also overturned the travel ban that the 9th circuit court said was not legal to ban. The 9th circuit leftwing biased judges have to learn some based constitutional law!
One has nothing to do with the other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2017, 03:17 PM
 
18,323 posts, read 10,692,214 times
Reputation: 8603
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Actually he is and has been.

Here is the link that proves it. It is easily proven that phma is on target while you are still looking for ammo to load a banana.

Short read of several paragraphs shouldn't strain anyone looking for knowledge.


Qualifications to Become a Federal Judge | Chron.com
I fully understand your thinking here. I mean trump is stupid so why shouldn't all his judges be idiots all so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2017, 03:20 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,917,545 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Actually he is and has been.

Here is the link that proves it. It is easily proven that phma is on target while you are still looking for ammo to load a banana.

Short read of several paragraphs shouldn't strain anyone looking for knowledge.


Qualifications to Become a Federal Judge | Chron.com
Nope, you never try to demean the people you are debating.

In the meantime, while you parse "qualifications", a man who has never tried a case in a court of law is not qualified to be a federal judge. Just like not every man aged 35 years who is a natural-born citizen is qualified to be President of the United States.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top