Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
that is what is important to YOU, because you desperate to try to discredit Mueller's investigation by any means you can.
BUT HARD LUCK , you failed. Your Dossier bull has been debunked and the Aussies back it up. Tough luck try going after something else. maybe you could argue Mueller is too white and that is unfair to Trump, or that Mueller is too Republican and that is unfair to Trump?
just keep throwing mud maybe you will finally get something to stick.
Then answer these questions.
Do you oppose, or support the FBI/DOJ complying with the subpoenas, and answering the question about the dossier?
Do you support the release of the FISA court application, and the documents listing the reasons for, and evidence to launch the Russian investigation?
I'm all for full transparency. If there is legitimate evidence for the FISA court warrant, and Russian investigation, so be it, I support everyone knowing the truth.
Sessions has recused himself, and doesn't want to get involved.
He can order his Department to comply with a subpoena without being involved in the investigation. Then there's Rod Rosenstein, a Trump appointee, who could also order the Department to comply with the subpoena. Christopher Wray, the Director of the FBI and a Trump appointee, could also direct the FBI to comply with the subpoena.
He can order his Department to comply with a subpoena without being involved in the investigation. Then there's Rod Rosenstein, a Trump appointee, who could also order the Department to comply with the subpoena. Christopher Wray, the Director of the FBI and a Trump appointee, could also direct the FBI to comply with the subpoena.
Session's hands are tied, it's Rosenstein that should be taking action on this.
I can't think of a reason not to comply with the subpoenas.
I didn't know Fusion GPS, was the FBI? How does Fusion GPS know this was not the motivation? Do they have heavy ties and intel to classified info? Are they the leak source?
''....We don’t believe the Steele dossier was the trigger for the F.B.I.’s investigation into Russian meddling," they wrote.
"As we told the Senate Judiciary Committee in August, our sources said the dossier was taken so seriously because it corroborated reports the bureau had received from other sources, including one inside the Trump camp."
..Republicans have refused to release full transcripts of our firm’s testimony, even as they selectively leak details to media outlets on the far right. It’s time to share what our company told investigators..."
...The intelligence committees have known for months that credible allegations of collusion between the Trump camp and Russia were pouring in from independent sources during the campaign. Yet lawmakers in the thrall of the president continue to wage a cynical campaign to portray us as the unwitting victims of Kremlin disinformation..."
''....We don’t believe the Steele dossier was the trigger for the F.B.I.’s investigation into Russian meddling," they wrote.
"As we told the Senate Judiciary Committee in August, our sources said the dossier was taken so seriously because it corroborated reports the bureau had received from other sources, including one inside the Trump camp."
..Republicans have refused to release full transcripts of our firm’s testimony, even as they selectively leak details to media outlets on the far right. It’s time to share what our company told investigators..."
...The intelligence committees have known for months that credible allegations of collusion between the Trump camp and Russia were pouring in from independent sources during the campaign. Yet lawmakers in the thrall of the president continue to wage a cynical campaign to portray us as the unwitting victims of Kremlin disinformation..."
Do you oppose, or support the FBI/DOJ complying with the subpoenas, and answering the questions about the dossier?
Do you support the release of the FISA court application, and the documents listing the reasons for, and evidence to launch the Russian investigation?
I'm all for full transparency. If there is legitimate evidence for the FISA court warrant, and Russian investigation, so be it, I support everyone knowing the truth.
Do you oppose, or support the FBI/DOJ complying with the subpoenas, and answering the questions about the dossier?
Do you support the release of the FISA court application, and the documents listing the reasons for, and evidence to launch the Russian investigation?
I'm all for full transparency. If there is legitimate evidence for the FISA court warrant, and Russian investigation, so be it, I support everyone knowing the truth.
Yes--full transparency. Republicans should release the transcripts. Please stay on topic--GOP obstruction.
"...Republicans have refused to release full transcripts of our firm’s testimony, even as they selectively leak details to media outlets on the far right. It’s time to share what our company told investigators..."
Session's hands are tied, it's Rosenstein that should be taking action on this.
I can't think of a reason not to comply with the subpoenas.
Do you think Rosenstein and Wray are secret Democrats?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
