Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-24-2019, 08:18 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,871 posts, read 9,546,294 times
Reputation: 15596

Advertisements

Exactly as I predicted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
Predictable Trumpling response. They cannot accept that Obama's stock market performance has been better than Trump's, so they have to just accuse you of 'not understanding' the numbers. Of course they do not tell you what it is about the numbers you're supposedly not understanding, and if you press them to do so they will either say something like, 'the absolute numbers were bigger' (which has already been discussed in this thread) or something like, 'I wouldn't even know where to begin' (which is a euphemism for 'I cannot really find anything wrong with your numbers but I want you to look stupid so I'm going to accuse you of not understanding your own numbers'), or something else to that effect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-24-2019, 08:19 PM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,060,758 times
Reputation: 2815
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
And for the record...the tax cuts handed to these corporations while most are enjoying record profits is kind of like a bail out/hand out...don't you think?
Just like the tariffs corporate profits are paid by the consumer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2019, 08:27 PM
 
7,343 posts, read 4,371,544 times
Reputation: 7659
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
And ... this is nothing more than yet another excuse to not answer my question.

All you're doing is making up excuse after excuse to avoid telling me why, according to you, my numbers are misleading or otherwise inaccurate.

Exactly as I predicted.
When Obama took office the high school football team was 0-12.

Obama got the team up to 6-6. Some praised him for that. Others said he held the team back and it should have improved faster.

Trump took the team from 6-6 to 10-2 and did it despite being moved into a more competitive division.

Obama technically gained more wins. Coach Trump presided over a better team. You are trying to say the Obama team was better. In order to say that, one must be a liar or dumb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2019, 08:37 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
30,377 posts, read 19,177,636 times
Reputation: 26270
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
As usual we have a slew of Trump fans around here screaming at everyone how great the stock market is doing under Trump.

And while it certainly is doing well, the reality is, it's only doing a little more than half as good as it did under Obama for the same number of market days. From Calculated Risk:

"At this point, the S&P 500 is up 23.2% under Mr. Trump compared to up 41.1% under Mr. Obama for the same number of market days."

Note the chart, as well.

Terribly strange these Trump fans aren't telling everyone how great the stock market did under Obama.

Now I expect the usual accusations that Calculated Risk is some sort of liberal blog (which is a joke, but I digress). Such accusations are, of course, pathetic, since one can check the accuracy of the claim just by punching in dates at a stock market website such as Marketwatch and calculating the figures for oneself.

Have a nice day.
take it from the day after the election....largest drop on the day after a Presidential election was day after Obama was elected and highest increase on the day after we elected Trump. Anyway, obama did good after we elected Repbublican Congress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2019, 08:39 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,627,209 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
You can't be serious?

Obama started with a market that had lost much of it's value, and was getting massive amounts of QE to prop it up.

This thread is right up there with the ridiculous thread about the NRA/Russia funding Trump.

The desperation of the dems is reaching an all time high.
Obama slowed and linited the market recovery.

Additionally, it was liberal government policies that crashed it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2019, 08:41 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,871 posts, read 9,546,294 times
Reputation: 15596
Quote:
Originally Posted by madison999 View Post
When Obama took office the high school football team was 0-12.

Obama got the team up to 6-6. Some praised him for that. Others said he held the team back and it should have improved faster.

Trump took the team from 6-6 to 10-2 and did it despite being moved into a more competitive division.

Obama technically gained more wins. Coach Trump presided over a better team. You are trying to say the Obama team was better. In order to say that, one must be a liar or dumb.
When coach Obama took the job the high school football team was 5-5.

His ~58% gain brought them to 8-2.

Trump came around and brought them to 10-0, a ~30% gain.

Obama gained 3 games, Trump gained 2.

Obama inherited a mediocre team and made them a winning team.

All coach Trump did was extend that success. 8-2 is already good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2019, 08:45 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,627,209 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
When coach Obama took the job the high school football team was 5-5.

His ~58% gain brought them to 8-2.

Trump came around and brought them to 10-0, a ~30% gain.

Obama gained 3 games, Trump gained 2.

Obama inherited a mediocre team and made them a winning team.

All coach Trump did was extend that success. 8-2 is already good.
When Obama got the team, the liberal administration had them fall down drunk. Luckily for. Obama, they ran out of booze.

It was their sobering up that got the team back on track, even with Obama saying every person should play QB regardless of talent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2019, 08:48 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,871 posts, read 9,546,294 times
Reputation: 15596
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
... Anyway, obama did good after we elected Repbublican Congress.
Considering that there were only 2 years prior to the election of a republican congress, and 6 years after the election of a republican congress, your observation is rather trivial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2019, 08:48 PM
 
7,343 posts, read 4,371,544 times
Reputation: 7659
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
When coach Obama took the job the high school football team was 5-5.

His ~58% gain brought them to 8-2.

Trump came around and brought them to 10-0, a ~30% gain.

Obama gained 3 games, Trump gained 2.

Obama inherited a mediocre team and made them a winning team.

All coach Trump did was extend that success. 8-2 is already good.
It's harder to take a team to 10-0 than from 5-5 to 8-2.

10-0 barely exists in reality. It's almost never realized.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2019, 08:51 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,871 posts, read 9,546,294 times
Reputation: 15596
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
When Obama got the team, the liberal administration had them fall down drunk. Luckily for. Obama, they ran out of booze.

It was their sobering up that got the team back on track, even with Obama saying every person should play QB regardless of talent.
Gee, that was clever.

When Trump got the team, they were all in top shape and had made great improvements. Thanks to the work coach Obama had put in the previous 8 years.

But not long after Trump took over, they started resting on their laurels and began partying hard after every game. As a result their record hasn't improved in the last year-and-a-half.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:22 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top