Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It still astonishes me sometimes how libdems don't read and believe what they are being told by CNN and MSNBC without question (even though a CNN producer admitted that their stories are 90% bull****, but that is another thread). Yesterday's indictment was a very quiet exoneration of Donald John Trump framed as a moral victory.
Not that Trump needed vindication. It has been a year and a half since these allegations were first launced and to date, no one has even suggested what "collusion" might mean or what the president might have done wrong. These allegations were only made to cover up and shift the narrative that wikileaks reavealed that the DNC are criminals who rigged elections, rigged polls, sent goons to Repulbican events, etc. Regardless of why they were made, after yesterday, they are dead. We have gone from talking about a massive internet conspiracy to internet trolls who reached a tiny part of the population.
Now, what libs missed with their breathless excitment over this new "bombshell" were the following words by Rod Rosenstien:
"Now, there is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election."
So there it is. You were played all along, and continue to be played. You are pinning your hopes on some incometent Russian trolls who bought Facebook adds when it was quitely admitted nothing actually influenced the election, and Trump had nothing to do with it.
Before anyone bothers: obstruction is a fantasty. There is a very high legal bar, and obstruction without and initial crime is not going to happen.
Good luck to you all in the little echo-chamber that you have created for yourselves. The future of this this thing is going to be determining who was responsible for spying on fellow Americans ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE. But I am sure this is not going to deter you in the slightest in your delusions. Little things like facts and truth rarely do.
They do, but won't admit it. So, they are off on alleged "affairs" now that happened years ago well before he was in office, or a candidate. They are moving onto the next accusation du jour.
"Now, there is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election."
Operative words "In This Indictment".
Meaning "More indictments to follow". Some will probably name Americans. Some may even name Trump staffers. Some may even name Trump himself. What an exciting time to be alive.
It still astonishes me sometimes how libdems don't read and believe what they are being told by CNN and MSNBC without question (even though a CNN producer admitted that their stories are 90% bull****, but that is another thread). Yesterday's indictment was a very quiet exoneration of Donald John Trump framed as a moral victory.
Not that Trump needed vindication. It has been a year and a half since these allegations were first launced and to date, no one has even suggested what "collusion" might mean or what the president might have done wrong. These allegations were only made to cover up and shift the narrative that wikileaks reavealed that the DNC are criminals who rigged elections, rigged polls, sent goons to Repulbican events, etc. Regardless of why they were made, after yesterday, they are dead. We have gone from talking about a massive internet conspiracy to internet trolls who reached a tiny part of the population.
Now, what libs missed with their breathless excitment over this new "bombshell" were the following words by Rod Rosenstien:
"Now, there is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election."
So there it is. You were played all along, and continue to be played. You are pinning your hopes on some incometent Russian trolls who bought Facebook adds when it was quitely admitted nothing actually influenced the election, and Trump had nothing to do with it.
Before anyone bothers: obstruction is a fantasty. There is a very high legal bar, and obstruction without and initial crime is not going to happen.
Good luck to you all in the little echo-chamber that you have created for yourselves. The future of this this thing is going to be determining who was responsible for spying on fellow Americans ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE. But I am sure this is not going to deter you in the slightest in your delusions. Little things like facts and truth rarely do.
Just like I'm seeing those Comey Memos have proved to be "exculpatory"evidence, meaning exoneration for the defense... Aka President Donald J Trump.
Oh but shhhh... Let's not slam the door shut on this just yet. Let's drag them along with their hope... All the way to the Midterm elections...
Impeach Fodifav! Impeach Fodifav!
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroWord
If it's just BS, why not just let the investigation run it's course? Why make thread after thread making all kinds of excuses under the sun?
Waa! Not My Obstruction of Justice! Not my Obstruction of Justice!
It still astonishes me sometimes how libdems don't read and believe what they are being told by CNN and MSNBC without question (even though a CNN producer admitted that their stories are 90% bull****, but that is another thread). Yesterday's indictment was a very quiet exoneration of Donald John Trump framed as a moral victory.
Not that Trump needed vindication. It has been a year and a half since these allegations were first launced and to date, no one has even suggested what "collusion" might mean or what the president might have done wrong. These allegations were only made to cover up and shift the narrative that wikileaks reavealed that the DNC are criminals who rigged elections, rigged polls, sent goons to Repulbican events, etc. Regardless of why they were made, after yesterday, they are dead. We have gone from talking about a massive internet conspiracy to internet trolls who reached a tiny part of the population.
Now, what libs missed with their breathless excitment over this new "bombshell" were the following words by Rod Rosenstien:
"Now, there is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election."
So there it is. You were played all along, and continue to be played. You are pinning your hopes on some incometent Russian trolls who bought Facebook adds when it was quitely admitted nothing actually influenced the election, and Trump had nothing to do with it.
Before anyone bothers: obstruction is a fantasty. There is a very high legal bar, and obstruction without and initial crime is not going to happen.
Good luck to you all in the little echo-chamber that you have created for yourselves. The future of this this thing is going to be determining who was responsible for spying on fellow Americans ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE. But I am sure this is not going to deter you in the slightest in your delusions. Little things like facts and truth rarely do.
Good. Now we can go onto another subject, lol. Nothing to see here, folks.
The FBI said no one from Trump's admin colluded with these Russians.
Really, where did they make this statement? Are you *just* referring to the indictment for the Russian troll farm? That is just one small piece of this bigger puzzle No one on the Trump campaign knowingly interacted with the "fake" personas. There were "unwitting." Do you think this one piecesof the investigation seals the whole thing up? Geez, no wonder these trolls were so successful with their propaganda. No deep thinkers here.
Really, where did they make this statement? Are you *just* referring to the indictment for the Russian troll farm? That is just one small piece of this bigger puzzle No one on the Trump campaign knowingly interacted with the "fake" personas. There were "unwitting." Do you think this one piecesof the investigation seals the whole thing up? Geez, no wonder these trolls were so successful with their propaganda. No deep thinkers here.
What propaganda defeated Hillary?
Are you saying Hillary lost because of the Russians?
Status:
"Apparently the worst poster on CD"
(set 29 days ago)
27,651 posts, read 16,138,284 times
Reputation: 19074
They’ve quietly changed the narrative so as not to acknowlege that truth. Msm is a pos
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not My Obstruction of Justice! Not my Obstruction of Justice!
