Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The judge simply told the president his legal reasoning for ending DACA doesn't hold up. Means he needs to find a better reason.
That's the rule of law.
The only reason he needs is he is the President of the United States and as such he has plenary authority to rescind executive orders without explaining himself to anyone, much less a federal judge.
showing large areas of land where a handful of people voted red is meaningless in terms of the vote. People vote. Cows and trees do not.
and a Trump supporter was the first to claim "will of the people." It remains a factual statement that Trump did not receive the popular vote, and claiming he has "the will of the people" remains a false statement.
How unsurprising to hear from Mr. Strict Constitutionalist (except not strict when he doesn't like the outcome). Nothing better than weighing in with bald hypocrisy.
The judge simply told the president his legal reasoning for ending DACA doesn't hold up. Means he needs to find a better reason.
That's the rule of law.
That an EO cannot be eliminated by another EO?
What if Obama had made the EO and wrote the EO to eliminate it? Would that work?
This is not an act of Congress here... This is the proof, it is political and not about the Constitutional reasoning.
What if Obama had made the EO and wrote the EO to eliminate it? Would that work?
This is not an act of Congress here... This is the proof, it is political and not about the Constitutional reasoning.
except of course it is about Constitutional reasoning. If Trump managed to come up with an EO on this issue that passed Constitutional muster, it will be allowed. So far, he hasn't.
What if Obama had made the EO and wrote the EO to eliminate it? Would that work?
This is not an act of Congress here... This is the proof, it is political and not about the Constitutional reasoning.
The implementation of an executive order must not be "arbitrary and capricious" in order to be Constitutional.
That is a pathetically low legal standard and the fact that this administration cannot meet it speaks volumes.
except of course it is about Constitutional reasoning. If Trump managed to come up with an EO on this issue that passed Constitutional muster, it will be allowed. So far, he hasn't.
obamas EO on DACA is in fact unconstitutional, since its the job of congress to pass immigration legislation, not the president.
No choice my hiney! That executive order was unconstitutional by Obama's own admission. But I guess it's ok if you're part of the elite party, you can do whatever you want, but if you're not, then you're a slave and a traitor who has to be put down.
This whole thing is one act of despotism after another, and what you must realize is, we the people have had about enough of your bull**** and are about to break free from your control by revolting!
We firmly believe a government that acts like this isn't a legit government to take orders from via the writings of our Founders.
We have repeatedly petitioned them and they've scorned us and abused us. Because of these increasing treacheries, we believe it's time to tell them that WE are in charge and they are NOT our Masters and that we aren't going to cooperate anymore.
Exactly! This is a rogue, criminal government and has been for many, many decades now:
obamas EO on DACA is in fact unconstitutional, since its the job of congress to pass immigration legislation, not the president.
Good, so when you find standing and a Federal Court that agrees with you, you’ll be all set. Godspeed!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is the proof, it is political and not about the Constitutional reasoning.
