Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, I'm repeating what the US Constitution actually says, and how Kennedy agreed. Twice. Over several decades. Once on religious ritual animal sacrifice (the Santeria case), and the 2nd time on compelling labor for a same-sex wedding (CO baker case). Unrelated except for their rulings' observance of and compliance with immutable Constitutional Rights.
I remember you now from the old thread. The repetitive, post-snipping Supremacy Clause fanatic.
When the next complaint against a business for refusing to serve a ssm hits the news, we'll see how not important the Masterpiece ruling is to the decision.
I remember you now from the old thread. The repetitive, post-snipping Supremacy Clause fanatic.
When the next complaint against a business for refusing to serve a ssm hits the news, we'll see how not important the Masterpiece ruling is to the decision.
Please keep us posted on that, because it is likely that these Commissions are going to be a lot more reluctant about taking these sorts of egregiously Anti-Christian actions in the aftermath of this decision. It may be that we do not hear about another such action for quite a while now.
Please keep us posted on that, because it is likely that these Commissions are going to be a lot more reluctant about taking these sorts of egregiously Anti-Christian actions in the aftermath of this decision. It may be that we do not hear about another such action for quite a while now.
I won't have to keep you posted. When the next complaint is filed we'll all hear about it and when decisions keep going against the businesses, you'll be complaining.
I won't have to keep you posted. When the next complaint is filed we'll all hear about it and when decisions keep going against the businesses, you'll be complaining.
There you go again. Posting on the clock again. Cheating your employer. Such gibberish, too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1
This issue is going to land right back in front of the supreme court.
Another baker will be sued and he or she will wax romantically about their 'art' and we'll be right back here.
And THAT is going to be interesting.
And, yes, IF the supreme court rules that a baker doesn't have to bake a cake - then a surgeon doesn't have to do surgery, and a tailor doesn't have to hem your pants, and a chef doesn't have to prepare your food . .
Please keep us posted on that, because it is likely that these Commissions are going to be a lot more reluctant about taking these sorts of egregiously Anti-Christian actions in the aftermath of this decision. It may be that we do not hear about another such action for quite a while now.
I have a feeling that the ACLU isn't golng to back down.
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthlyfather
There you go again. Posting on the clock again. Cheating your employer. Such gibberish, too.
Personal attack = unable to address the topic at hand.
I have a feeling that the ACLU isn't golng to back down.
Good. Glad to hear it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
