Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-11-2018, 04:31 AM
 
1,675 posts, read 578,116 times
Reputation: 490

Advertisements

That is the title of the latest report from amnesty international. I saw a news title by VOA "Counter-IS Coalition Slams Amnesty Report on Raqqa" and it made me want to read the 70 page report.
Before I share the interesting info, I'll add some basic info from wikipedia so everyone is up to date with the issue.

The last battle of raqqa was fought between 6 June – 17 October 2017. Isis had taken control of the city. They were driven out by the coalition of the u.s., the uk, france, and the sdf (finance by the countries just mentioned). Isis finances itself through their illegal business, but there are many accusation of being supported by saudi arabia and qatar (this came out with hilary clinton's emails), turkey and syria (this doesn't make sense), and without fail the u.s. has been accused by Rand Paul for indirectly supporting isis by arming their allies.

To the report:

IS’s disregard for the most basic rules of international humanitarian law was flagrant. It trapped civilians in their neighbourhoods and used them as cover for military operations. IS entered residents’ homes by force and used them to conceal their movements and as firing positions against SDF lines. IS dress code, imposed on civilians and IS fighters alike, made it even more difficult for SDF and Coalition forces to distinguish between them.

Furthermore, civilians who were trapped in Haratal-Badu until the end told Amnesty International that IS fighters were evacuated before the civilians. Jamila, a mother of two, said: “When we heard that there was a truce and we would be allowed to leave Raqqa, we thought this was for us, the civilians, but then when the buses came we realised they were for Daesh (ISIS).

“In five months they fired 30,000 artillery rounds on ISIS targets...They fired more rounds in five months in Raqqa, Syria, than any other Marine artillery battalion, or any Marine or Army battalion, since the Vietnam War.

The wholesale destruction wrought upon every almost street in Raqqa as a result of artillery and airstrikes stands in stark contrast to Coalition claims about precision strikes.124 UN experts, Amnesty International’s researchers who conducted the investigation, and seasoned war correspondents found the level of destruction in Raqqa worse than anything previously witnessed in other wars.

The cases presented in this report, based on the findings and analysis of Amnesty International, raise a very strong possibility that civilians were killed and injured (and civilian objects were destroyed or damaged) in violation of international humanitarian law.


More wikipedia info:
80% to 90% of the city was destroyed.
Out of an estimate of 3000-5000 isis fighter about 1300 were killed. 1300 -1800 civilians killed.

My conclusion:
The u.s. with a few others helping, completely destroyed a city in order to kill 1300 terrorists, killing even more civilians as collateral damage, and at the end they provide buses so the remaining terrorists can go on their way. All the while doing it in a country where they are not welcomed. There's more than meets the eye. Do you know what it is?

Sources:
https://www.amnesty.org/download/Doc...018ENGLISH.PDF
https://www.voanews.com/a/counter-is...a/4425944.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle...te-shocking-40
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islami...and_the_Levant
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-11-2018, 05:59 AM
 
Location: North Central Florida
6,218 posts, read 7,736,917 times
Reputation: 3939
War always provides the opportunity to experiment with new and different means of destruction , to analyze the efficiency thereof.

CN
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 06:30 AM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,454,796 times
Reputation: 6960
"War is hell"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 06:50 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,333 posts, read 54,455,929 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
"War is hell"

War is a racket _____ Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler


https://ratical.org/ratville/CAH/warisaracket.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,388,627 times
Reputation: 14459
The innocents consented to being obliterated by remaining in a specific geographic location.

- Common statist proverb
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 06:58 AM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,875,496 times
Reputation: 9284
You see bombs cost zero US lives... if the liberals weren't so histrionic with any US casualties, it could probably have been done with far less civilian casualty... but then liberals care more about a "cause" than reality...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 07:22 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,333 posts, read 54,455,929 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilnewbie View Post
You see bombs cost zero US lives... if the liberals weren't so histrionic with any US casualties, it could probably have been done with far less civilian casualty... but then liberals care more about a "cause" than reality...

If conservatives weren't so uncaring about US casualties we'd get involved in fewer asinine wars of choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 07:29 AM
 
13,512 posts, read 17,049,342 times
Reputation: 9691
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilnewbie View Post
You see bombs cost zero US lives... if the liberals weren't so histrionic with any US casualties, it could probably have been done with far less civilian casualty... but then liberals care more about a "cause" than reality...
Oh, bombs are "liberal" now.

I have a toothache, that tooth is "liberal". I stubbed my toe, that chair leg is "liberal".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 07:38 AM
 
28,122 posts, read 12,627,534 times
Reputation: 15341
IMO, the movie 'Wag the dog' was extremely accurate at depicting what 'war' is really about, its the dumb little peasants like us, that keep believing every word our leaders tell us, like about why we are going to war, why its necessary, etc.

I think its important to consider this...(about war in general)...

The 'war' on terrorism can only be justified when there IS terrorism happening.

The 'war' on drugs can only be justified when there is a significant drug problem.

If we didnt have a consistent steady flow of drugs or terrorism coming in, there can be justification to wage the war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 07:47 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,333 posts, read 54,455,929 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstevens62 View Post
IMO, the movie 'Wag the dog' was extremely accurate at depicting what 'war' is really about, its the dumb little peasants like us, that keep believing every word our leaders tell us, like about why we are going to war, why its necessary, etc.

I think its important to consider this...(about war in general)...

The 'war' on terrorism can only be justified when there IS terrorism happening.

The 'war' on drugs can only be justified when there is a significant drug problem.

If we didnt have a consistent steady flow of drugs or terrorism coming in, there can be justification to wage the war.

Looking at the Iraq invasion/occupation it would seem the only thing needed to justify the US initiating a war is a well publicized suspicion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top