Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Congress could pass a law this evening that anyone apprehended employing those without the proper documents would have their assets seized until it could be determined how much they owe in taxes, and significant penalties.
This would all be resolved in no time.
You are correct. That's the only thing that would stop it, besides jail time. That'll never happen. For years, one of the largest donators to the state Republican party was a builder. Can't see anybody going after them.
The law would need to seize all assets. Several businesses in my area have paid over a million in fines. One was just a little pissant local donut chain. They never skipped a beat. The donuts were selling like hotcakes. The other is a well love chain of restaurants, Mexican, seafood, BBQ. When thy knew ICE was coming they shipped employees to other towns. One cook got deported and they got him back, illegally. Put the CEO in jail.
But as another CD poster says business cannot be responsible for verifying citizenship. Why not?
DH worked for an outfit that got some stimulus money to weatherize the homes of low income seniors. He had to put on an additional payroll clerk to check the I 9s of anybody who worked on the project. It was stipulated in the contract.
This is correct. I say this as a right winger.
The truth is boomer conservatism (Limbaugh, et al) is a kind of lazy, boomer-tier, 90 IQ dogwhistle to white people who recognize that diversity is code for anti-white. These boomers are controlled by Jewish handlers (who are also ethnonationalists..but for their own tribe) and so they have to dog whistle in embarrassing ways.
You can ask a leftist what he believes and he'll tell you. Ask a boomer conservative and they'll give you ten pages of incoherence about law and order, the constitution, etc. because the boomercon cannot intellectually comprehend that what they are really talking about is White identity politics.
Whites deserve their own homeland, and that is something that a boomer conservative knows in his heart but can't get himself to say.
You're probably the most articulate right-winger I've ever run into.
But why would whites "deserve" their own homeland? And, really, aren't there a few? Israel was created after horrendous persecution (not something that "whites" have suffered) because there was no Jewish homeland, but it seems to me that there are white homelands already in Scandinavia.
But, then, if someone was so separatist that he wanted to exclude any non-white, why not break it down further? Wouldn't they want a separate homeland for those of Germany ancestry, those of British ancestry, those of Danish ancestry? What a horribly limited, insular, ego-centric homeland that would be.
The Republican party no longer embodies conservative values and spends entirely too much money. They are as drunk with spending as any democrat. I feel for the Freedom Caucus having to deal with them.
The Republican party no longer embodies conservative values and spends entirely too much money. They are as drunk with spending as any democrat. I feel for the Freedom Caucus having to deal with them.
LOL, The Freedom Caucus is part of the reason why nothing ever gets done in Congress with their endless grandstanding.
Republicans will continue to be the party of irrationality until they accept the reality of man-made climate change. This is probably one of the biggest turn-off's for me and why I don't take their political party seriously. It's one thing to express political and social belief, but to deny overwhelming scientific evidence, is a whole other ballgame.
Republicans will continue to be the party of irrationality until they accept the reality of man-made climate change. This is probably one of the biggest turn-off's for me and why I don't take their political party seriously. It's one thing to express political and social belief, but to deny overwhelming scientific evidence, is a whole other ballgame.
How do you feel about conflict of interest? Do you see it as a problem, where it is occuring?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
