Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You oddly just don't get it or won't admit it is wrong to hire a lesser qualified person because of diversity. It is also unfair to anyone dealing with the negative consequences of these hiring practices, including minorities.
The airplane crash will not discriminate among its victims.
But no one said to hire less qualified applicants.
__________________ ____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
You oddly just don't get it or won't admit it is wrong to hire a lesser qualified person because of diversity. It is also unfair to anyone dealing with the negative consequences of these hiring practices, including minorities.
The airplane crash will not discriminate among its victims.
Is there any proof that the new hires are less qualified? Is there anything to show that this guy is not just a disgruntled former employee or 'white right's activist?'
Anybody can file a lawsuit. Did he win?
If not, then nothing wrong was done.
If he won, then the policy will be changed, and again it will have no effect.
So what point is it that you think you are trying to make?
But no one said to hire less qualified applicants.
They assume if you are not white, you are automatically less qualified than your white competition. That's the basis of their argument, because of course, they can't prove that non-whites who land jobs over whites are less qualified.
Maybe they interviewed better. Maybe the have some quality or talent to offer that the white candidate didn't. Maybe they're a better fit with the company's culture. There are a myriad of reasons why one person might get a job over another applicant.
But nope, it's got to be because they're a person of color. That is the only possible reason.
They assume if you are not white, you are automatically less qualified than your white competition. That's the basis of their argument, because of course, they can't prove that non-whites who land jobs over whites are less qualified.
Maybe they interviewed better. Maybe the have some quality or talent to offer that the white candidate didn't. Maybe they're a better fit with the company's culture. There are a myriad of reasons why one person might get a job over another applicant.
But nope, it's got to be because they're a person of color. That is the only possible reason.
That's how a racist's mind works.
Agreed. Ironically, I was against Affirmative Action and these types of hiring practices, because I thought racism was a thing of the past.
I have since learned it is definitely alive and well, so now I support efforts to continue diversification.
It kinda hurts my heart.
__________________ ____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
Agreed. Ironically, I was against Affirmative Action and these types of hiring practices, because I thought racism was a thing of the past.
I have since learned it is definitely alive and well, so now I support efforts to continue diversification.
It kinda hurts my heart.
It's not racist to want the most qualified.
Did you know that there is a group of Asians suing Harvard?
Because of diversity and affirmative action, Asians are NOT getting into Harvard,even though they have met and exceeded the standards of admission. They are being passed over because of diversity and affirmative action.
Are Asians racist because they want to be represented by their ability and not passed over because they can't check off another box on the form?
They are literally being passed over for jobs and scholarships even if they are the most well qualified, because of PC. It is blatant discrimination. They are being pushed down because their grandfathers and ancestors many years ago were given privilege. Now the grandchildren and great grandchildren and their children are supposed to PAY because of how society was in the distant past. It is basically revenge toward innocent people who had nothing to do with racism or sexism. They are supposed to feel guilt and shame for things others did in the past, as Germans are doing to themselves.
I don't believe that, and you can't go on an isolated cases here and there. Plus the Trump administration said there are jobs everywhere, that there are more jobs out there than people to fill them.
Oh, the Obama supporter who wants to make trouble just like a good radical communist.. to divide this nation. We get it.
Trump is doing a pretty good job of that all by himself, in no way a uniter.
Last edited by ipaper; 06-21-2018 at 03:15 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
