Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-22-2018, 08:55 AM
 
45,541 posts, read 27,152,040 times
Reputation: 23858

Advertisements

WHITE HOUSE PROPOSES PRIVATIZING FANNIE AND FREDDIE
The Trump administration proposed on Thursday an end to the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which would move the government-sponsored enterprises (GSE) into the private sector.


The changes aim to “ensure more transparency and accountability to taxpayers, and to minimize the risk of taxpayer-funded bailouts, while maintaining responsible and sustainable support for homeowners.”
This would be a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-22-2018, 10:59 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,461 posts, read 5,702,939 times
Reputation: 6082
I know Fannie and Freddie were in the news during the financial crisis, that's why the general populace knows about them. But what about other mortgage related quasi-private enterprises? Ginnie Mae, Farmer Mac, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2018, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Florida
77,005 posts, read 47,597,802 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
The changes aim to “ensure more transparency and accountability to taxpayers, and to minimize the risk of taxpayer-funded bailouts, while maintaining responsible and sustainable support for homeowners.”

This would be a good thing.
To minimize the risk of bailouts.....does Trump not understand that Bush nationalized them in order to bail them out?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2018, 11:07 AM
 
22,653 posts, read 24,575,170 times
Reputation: 20319
Yeah, if it didn't happen after the so-called "great recession", it ain't gunna happen now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2018, 11:19 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,820,716 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
I know Fannie and Freddie were in the news during the financial crisis, that's why the general populace knows about them. But what about other mortgage related quasi-private enterprises? Ginnie Mae, Farmer Mac, etc.

they also all need to be privatized.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
To minimize the risk of bailouts.....does Trump not understand that Bush nationalized them in order to bail them out?

given trumps foresight, i think he does understand, and i think that is why he wants to privatize them again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2018, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Florida
7,770 posts, read 6,376,660 times
Reputation: 15770
YES! The govt has no business being in the finance business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2018, 03:20 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,652,271 times
Reputation: 2522
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
WHITE HOUSE PROPOSES PRIVATIZING FANNIE AND FREDDIE
The Trump administration proposed on Thursday an end to the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which would move the government-sponsored enterprises (GSE) into the private sector.


The changes aim to “ensure more transparency and accountability to taxpayers, and to minimize the risk of taxpayer-funded bailouts, while maintaining responsible and sustainable support for homeowners.”
This would be a good thing.
This could be a good thing for consumers or it could be a good thing for investors, it all depends on the privatization policy reforms.
https://floify.com/blog/privatizing-...ae-freddie-mac

And since republicans practice trickle down/supply side economics these privatization policies will most likely be designed to help investors. For example, the Trump tax cuts raised workers income by 0.8% and raised the richest 0.1% of Americans income by 14.2%.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/janetno...nalysis-finds/

And past privatization plans still had the government financially responsible for 90% of Fannie and Freddie mortgages.
The disastrous idea for privatizing Fannie and Freddie | Al Jazeera America

Since Washington lobbyists privatization plans have the government responsible for 90% of the mortgages, republican privatization policies will most likely leave the government 90% responsible for the mortgages (the mortgage industry will simply get more freedom to make money from consumers.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2018, 03:43 PM
 
20,706 posts, read 19,349,208 times
Reputation: 8278
Actually I am for nationalizing it and making the profits a tax that replaces income tax. It would simply be a national property tax with market forces. However anything is better than profit side capitalism and loss side socialism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2018, 03:47 PM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,832,630 times
Reputation: 25341
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
WHITE HOUSE PROPOSES PRIVATIZING FANNIE AND FREDDIE
The Trump administration proposed on Thursday an end to the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which would move the government-sponsored enterprises (GSE) into the private sector.


The changes aim to “ensure more transparency and accountability to taxpayers, and to minimize the risk of taxpayer-funded bailouts, while maintaining responsible and sustainable support for homeowners.”
This would be a good thing.
This will make money for many people in Trump's aura
One reason Mnuchin went to work for Trump was to pressure this outcome
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2018, 06:13 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,820,716 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
Actually I am for nationalizing it and making the profits a tax that replaces income tax. It would simply be a national property tax with market forces. However anything is better than profit side capitalism and loss side socialism.

the problem is that the government cant make money, they can only spend it in huge amounts. take the mustang ranch in nevada for instance. the owner failed to pay his taxes, so the IRS stepped in and took possession of the business, and in the course of running it LOST MONEY. if you cant make money selling alcohol and sex, then you are certainly a poor businessman, and the government is a poor businessman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top