Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We're getting Soldiers back...but obviously you don't care about that....unless you think the Army Times is also lying about the caskets? Pretty sad...even for you....
Show us where kim is MAKING IMPROVEMENTS....don't show that stupid 38th picture either....unless you can show us the before picture....it's amusing that you'll believe a picture not knowing what the before looked like....
I'll trust the people that do this for a living, over you telling me to prove something that not many people of the general public have access to, like up to date satellite footage of the North Korean sites.
We're getting Soldiers back...but obviously you don't care about that....unless you think the Army Times is also lying about the caskets? Pretty sad...even for you....
I hope that they do testing to confirm they are indeed remains of US Service members.
It's amusing you assume they are truly remains of US Service members without knowing, and just going by what Kim says.
The original report on the nuclear site came from an NBC news report that no longer exists. It appears to have been taken down after it was noted that the reporter Ken Dilanian had previously been outed as a CIA asset by The Intercept.
The people that do "this for a living" have a vested interest in providing information that keeps them employed. They often remain nameless sources so they can't answer to the claims they make.
I hope that they do testing to confirm they are indeed remains of US Service members.
It's amusing you assume they are truly remains of US Service members without knowing, and just going by what Kim says.
See how that works?
The only problem is history is not on your side....NK has provided remains many years ago and they were identified as US Soldiers........some research on your part would be great....
The only problem is history is not on your side....NK has provided remains many years ago and they were identified as US Soldiers........some research on your part would be great....
That same history would tell you that anything the Kims say should be taken with a shaker of salt, and that their word isn't all that trustworthy.
Yet, they still gave us troops....and I don't think one time I have every stated that I 100% trust him....maybe you can show me where I said that?
Well good, then we both have our own level of trepidation, that we can agree upon.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
! was started on 6/27. The Singapore meeting was on 6/12.
