Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-07-2018, 06:12 PM
 
Location: United States
12,391 posts, read 7,102,019 times
Reputation: 6135

Advertisements

Well, it's official, in a court filing Mueller confirms he will not introduce any evidence of Russian collusion in the Manafort case, all you Trump haters can finally give it up.


https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/statu...35203643961344
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-07-2018, 06:14 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,103,684 times
Reputation: 6842
That’s bcause Manafort indictment has nothing to do with Russian collusion despite the left claiming it was somehow connected
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2018, 10:14 AM
 
Location: United States
12,391 posts, read 7,102,019 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
That’s bcause Manafort indictment has nothing to do with Russian collusion despite the left claiming it was somehow connected
Yes, I was posting this absolute confirmation that there Manafort case has nothing to do with Russian collusion.

Where are all the Trump haters on here that kept tell us that Mueller was going to prove Manafort was colluding with Trump, and the Russians?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2018, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,195 posts, read 19,225,735 times
Reputation: 14919
So they're going to tie Manafort and Trump together as conspirators in bank fraud instead of Russian collusion, but only for the scope of this trial.

That works. Bank fraud is good. Collusion can come later. We can wait.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2018, 11:27 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,654,236 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
So they're going to tie Manafort and Trump together as conspirators in bank fraud instead of Russian collusion, but only for the scope of this trial.

That works. Bank fraud is good. Collusion can come later. We can wait.
There's a problem.
What they are nailing Manafort for, happened more than 10 years ago, well before Trump and his campaign.
Then there is a Statute of Limitations at play.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2018, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,554,711 times
Reputation: 24780
I have a sneaking suspicion that Mueller is saving the best shot for the biggest target.

Manafort is a sideshow.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2018, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,195 posts, read 19,225,735 times
Reputation: 14919
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
There's a problem.
What they are nailing Manafort for, happened more than 10 years ago, well before Trump and his campaign.
Then there is a Statute of Limitations at play.
Wrongamundo. This is the situation.


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...n-loan-n852096
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2018, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,195 posts, read 19,225,735 times
Reputation: 14919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
I have a sneaking suspicion that Mueller is saving the best shot for the biggest target.

Manafort is a sideshow.

Manafort is to Trump as a shrimp cocktail is to a roast pig - merely an appetizer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2018, 12:20 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,741 posts, read 7,620,616 times
Reputation: 15011
Mueller will not introduce Russian collusion evidence in Manafort case


Probably because Meuller's job (as required by the Special Counsel law the liberals wrote way back when) is to investigate a crime..... and "collusion" isn't one.

In fact, have the liberals ever identified what crime the Special Counsel was originally empowered to investigate? The law says there has to be one, and it has to be identified in the papers submitted to appoint him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2018, 03:39 PM
 
1,705 posts, read 538,926 times
Reputation: 1142
Muellers job was to look into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and any crimes that might arise from that investigation.

Not collusion!!


That Trump can´t stop tweeting that its a which hunt, when all Mueller is looking into is if Russian operatives, either in Russia or embedded in the US, tried to sway American voters, directly or indirectly with covert or overt means.

Trump does not like that.. so he calls it a which hunt.

Guess he does not want to be outed as a Russian collaborator...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top