Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You want a smoking gun for the Russian collusion? This is it. We still don't have proof who fired the gun, but it is smoking alright. Big time smoking.
1. The Russians stole the data and sat on it. (Which makes one wonder why they stole it in the first place). And miraculously the Trump campaign had an epiphany and completely changed their strategy. A strategy that would align with the analysis of the stolen data but their epiphany is completely independent of it.
Or
2. The Russians stole the data and anonymously dropped it off at the front step of Trump's campaign. The Trump campaign, without questioning where the data was from, bought into it 100% and started to change their strategy.
Or
3. The Russians stole the data and shared with the Trump campaign. In other words, collusion!
Which one do you think it is?
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4dognight
OR
Kelly Ann Conway did an interview right after the election. In it she told how that they did their own polling which showed Trump doing well in certain states that he wasn't supposed to be doing as well in.
They changed their strategy and campaigned in states that usually would have gone Democrat.
Hillary didn't bother with those states. She was too busy hiding her sickness.
Your smoking gun has blanks.
got to agree with 4dognight here. OP you are speculating at best, or falling for stupidity at worst.
Welp, that's it.
We're toast. We'll never survive this. Trump will be gone in a week. Looks like the NeverTrumpers have the goods on us now. Trump will have to resign and turn it over to Hillary. "I knew they'd never let him be president".
This is pure speculation, the new normal in US journalism, descending to a level even below The National Enquirer and now matching Fox News. The press has helped to divide America into two alternative, made-up realities, neither of which have any factual basis. Is there a third alternative, anywhere? None that I have seen or heard.
You want a smoking gun for the Russian collusion? This is it. We still don't have proof who fired the gun, but it is smoking alright. Big time smoking.
1. The Russians stole the data and sat on it. (Which makes one wonder why they stole it in the first place). And miraculously the Trump campaign had an epiphany and completely changed their strategy. A strategy that would align with the analysis of the stolen data but their epiphany is completely independent of it.
Or
2. The Russians stole the data and anonymously dropped it off at the front step of Trump's campaign. The Trump campaign, without questioning where the data was from, bought into it 100% and started to change their strategy.
Or
3. The Russians stole the data and shared with the Trump campaign. In other words, collusion!
Which one do you think it is?
.
That’s when they had the data from Cambridge Analytica. I just looked it up and it said they got data in September 2016.
The data was released internally from the DNC. If you want to argue that the Trump people saw the obvious implications while Hillary continued to ignore them, many of us have argued that for a long time.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.