Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-21-2018, 06:07 PM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,196,139 times
Reputation: 23898

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
https://twitter.com/JasonMillerinDC/...52744358813697

What Jason meant was "Our theft-driven campaign is shifting resources..."

By the way, using stolen computer data is a federal offense and is a felony. 18 USC 1030.
Unless you are Wasserman-Schultz and Awan... then you get a pass... maybe...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-21-2018, 06:08 PM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,196,139 times
Reputation: 23898
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
Thanks for the update. Trump wins by a landslide in ‘20. Enjoy that.
Can you imagine the total apoplectic response from the left if he gets 4 more years... OMG...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2018, 06:11 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,847,766 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
You want a smoking gun for the Russian collusion? This is it. We still don't have proof who fired the gun, but it is smoking alright. Big time smoking.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUApwyJhizQ


There are three possible scenarios:

1. The Russians stole the data and sat on it. (Which makes one wonder why they stole it in the first place). And miraculously the Trump campaign had an epiphany and completely changed their strategy. A strategy that would align with the analysis of the stolen data but their epiphany is completely independent of it.

Or

2. The Russians stole the data and anonymously dropped it off at the front step of Trump's campaign. The Trump campaign, without questioning where the data was from, bought into it 100% and started to change their strategy.

Or

3. The Russians stole the data and shared with the Trump campaign. In other words, collusion!


Which one do you think it is?

.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4dognight View Post
OR


Kelly Ann Conway did an interview right after the election. In it she told how that they did their own polling which showed Trump doing well in certain states that he wasn't supposed to be doing as well in.
They changed their strategy and campaigned in states that usually would have gone Democrat.

Hillary didn't bother with those states. She was too busy hiding her sickness.

Your smoking gun has blanks.

got to agree with 4dognight here. OP you are speculating at best, or falling for stupidity at worst.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2018, 06:14 PM
 
501 posts, read 303,590 times
Reputation: 245
To use that sports analogy:

Losing, in the fourth quarter, a football team modifies their strategy and wins.

Losing team: "That must mean they stole our playbook! Smoking gun!!!11!!!!".

ROTFLMAO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2018, 10:45 PM
 
Location: PSL
8,224 posts, read 3,498,932 times
Reputation: 2963
And they managed to leave the NRA out of the equation this go around. I thought the NRA caused this? LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2018, 11:08 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,578 posts, read 17,293,027 times
Reputation: 37334
Welp, that's it.
We're toast. We'll never survive this. Trump will be gone in a week. Looks like the NeverTrumpers have the goods on us now. Trump will have to resign and turn it over to Hillary. "I knew they'd never let him be president".



Oh yeah
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2018, 11:11 PM
 
4,559 posts, read 1,437,602 times
Reputation: 1919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frihed89 View Post
This is pure speculation, the new normal in US journalism, descending to a level even below The National Enquirer and now matching Fox News. The press has helped to divide America into two alternative, made-up realities, neither of which have any factual basis. Is there a third alternative, anywhere? None that I have seen or heard.
National Enquirer? Ha!

When dealing with Trump...always go lower.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2018, 11:14 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,656,546 times
Reputation: 13053
WOW !!! They got him this time !!! ( again )

Until.........

The smoking gun was found and it looks like a liberal suicide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2018, 02:07 AM
 
21,479 posts, read 10,579,563 times
Reputation: 14129
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
You want a smoking gun for the Russian collusion? This is it. We still don't have proof who fired the gun, but it is smoking alright. Big time smoking.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUApwyJhizQ


There are three possible scenarios:

1. The Russians stole the data and sat on it. (Which makes one wonder why they stole it in the first place). And miraculously the Trump campaign had an epiphany and completely changed their strategy. A strategy that would align with the analysis of the stolen data but their epiphany is completely independent of it.

Or

2. The Russians stole the data and anonymously dropped it off at the front step of Trump's campaign. The Trump campaign, without questioning where the data was from, bought into it 100% and started to change their strategy.

Or

3. The Russians stole the data and shared with the Trump campaign. In other words, collusion!


Which one do you think it is?

.
That’s when they had the data from Cambridge Analytica. I just looked it up and it said they got data in September 2016.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2018, 02:13 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
The data was released internally from the DNC. If you want to argue that the Trump people saw the obvious implications while Hillary continued to ignore them, many of us have argued that for a long time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top