Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-23-2018, 09:48 PM
 
Location: Arizona
6,137 posts, read 3,861,014 times
Reputation: 4899

Advertisements

https://www.kff.org/medicaid/state-i...:%22desc%22%7D

http://www.hsd.state.nm.us/uploads/F...ay2018_MSR.pdf

Looks like 72% of women in New Mexico are having babies they can't afford and are just trying to have as many future criminals, welfare shoppers and welfare as a career people.

I am all for Medicaid state of the art block program that would mean states get an amount on a per-capita basis tied to inflation from the federal government and get massive amounts of extra money because they are like New Mexico where having as many babies as possible when poor is practically a cultural tradition.

Why does the state of New Mexico where having babies when poor is a cultural custom and highly praised being subsidized by people in states like North Dakota and New Hampshire who don't have the same cultural customs.

Time for Medicaid block grant which would mean states get Medicaid based on population size.

I personally would love to see big Medicaid expansions in states like New Hampshire and North Dakota under a per-capita block grant, while states like California and New Mexico have a healthcare system that collapses.

Would be interesting if the whole health care system collapsed in states like New Mexico and California and the massive number of women who do nothing but get pregnant and have more future criminals as a career didn't have access to OBGYN's when they needed them most.

The Medicaid system would be better than ever for states like North Dakota, New Hampshire while states like New Mexico and California would have a health care system that completely collapses.

Last edited by lovecrowds; 07-23-2018 at 10:50 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-23-2018, 10:12 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,717,658 times
Reputation: 20674
1) New Mexico- 72%

2) Arkansas- 67%

3) Louisiana- 65%

4) Three- way tie- Mississippi, Nevada and Wisconsin - 64%

Cut off Medicaid and moms to be will show up in the ER and the subsidized cost becomes a part of the hospital’s overhead that everyone pays.

Perhaps a saner approach would be for Medicaid to pay for all births, in birthing centers, delivered by licensed midwives, unless a hospital birth is a medical necessity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2018, 10:20 PM
 
369 posts, read 325,246 times
Reputation: 924
Right!
So now it's prenatal to grave.
The downhill grade just got a little steeper.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top