Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And yet, you don't explain why. He is not trying to make a point. He is simply trying to stereotypically demonize others and there are a good number of people that eat that up.
I explained with numbers why he is wrong.
No you didn't, you used irrelevant numbers proving you didn't understand his point. Again, perhaps if you watched it all, it may have sunk in. Give it another go.
Get a bill for $2500 and the insurance pays $1800. If you don't have insurance the provider wants $2500.
Should all of this be addressed? absolutely. With Universal Health Care there aren't all these different variables.
Yes there are. One can go to a place that accepts cash and can get treated right away instead of having a long wait that is common place in the UK with it's grand universal healthcare..
Sure, I’m not going to go searching his entire Twitter page again but whenever two people he doesn’t like are in a debate he uses terms like Iran-Iraq war redux saying he wishes both sides would be destroyed in the process (despite one side invading the other with the help of his favorite president). He went more in depth once saying how the world would have been better if both sides were destroyed, etc.
Even in dumb circumstances like pop culture debates I’ve seen him mention it as a joke. It’s not a joke to me.
I've read and viewed a lot of his commentary with reference to foreign policy. I haven't seen or heard him say that he wants millions to die as you claimed. I don't think you can provide evidence.
Because he makes fun of the war that killed a million of my people, he excuses Reagan's death squads in central America, and attacks anyone who criticizes the slaughter in Yemen. The man is a state propagandist.
Nope. He doesn't. Why do you make this up? Perhaps provide some evidence.
No you didn't, you used irrelevant numbers proving you didn't understand his point. Again, perhaps if you watched it all, it may have sunk in. Give it another go.
Providing the amount we actually spend each year on health care is an irrelevant number? You watched it, explain it to me.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is this satire? Or do you honestly think that was his point?
universal healthcare..
