Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-23-2018, 11:35 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,206,841 times
Reputation: 18824

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by golgi1 View Post
Any take-down of a local State, say out to Iran, that is not friendly to us and has reason to look Eastward is in our national interest. From a strict geopolitical perspective. That's not really debatable.
That’s a bunch of gibberish.

Go ahead and give me your justification for invading Venezuela without all the drivel please. Anytime you’re advocating naked aggression based on a ‘might makes right’ principle, you should make it as clear as possible that THAT is what you’re asserting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-23-2018, 11:44 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,206,841 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
He just might.

We, like the rest of the world, do have an interest in Venezuela oil.
So if I have an interest in something that you own and I think you’re inept as an individual, do I have a right to smack you up and insert myself into your affairs just because I’m stronger than you?

You might wanna be careful about advocating something like that. And the reason why is simple, to paraphrase Samuel Jackson in Pulp Fiction...”you’re the weak, NOT the tyranny of evil men.”

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
1) You and I are clearly on the same page of non-intervention.

2) Bad comparison to Dubya. We don't already have a buttload of troops etc. stationed on Venezuela's border a la Gulf 1 nor do we have a country like Saudi Arabia encouraging us etc. etc. etc. It's just a whole different logistical animal.

3) Gulf 2 brought a lot of people around to more isolationist thinking like the two of us.

4) This isn't "fake news" about the crisis within that country. BBC has good coverage of the situation without having to deal with Fox etc. bias.

5) Let's not confuse Fox's ratings grab coverage with intent to start action. If you see ALL of the US media doing it then we need to start worrying. For right now I think it's just the usual red meat for the base because it makes them money.
The United States has troops VERY close to Venezuela...right here in the United States.

And no, it’s not fake news, but it IS irrelevant to our national interests/security.

Yes, many more people are non interventionist nowadays, but Americans are easy to convince into a war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 03:44 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,654,438 times
Reputation: 2522
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultor View Post
You're reading the tea leaves wrong. No one is going to intervene in Venezuela.

the purpose of the coverage is to prevent the Democrats from turning the U.S. into Venezuela.
"Donald Trump repeatedly raised the possibility of invading Venezuela in talks with his top aides at the White House" (and administration officials took turns trying to talk him out of it.)

And Trump brought up a Venezuela invasion in public saying: “We have many options for Venezuela, including a possible military option, if necessary."

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...nezuela-report

Last edited by chad3; 08-24-2018 at 04:51 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 04:10 AM
 
2,362 posts, read 777,947 times
Reputation: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by golgi1 View Post
Any take-down of a local State, say out to Iran, that is not friendly to us and has reason to look Eastward is in our national interest. From a strict geopolitical perspective. That's not really debatable.
You can say it's in the self-interest of a burglar to break into your home and take your jewelry. But that doesn't make it "right."

If the US goes around toppling governments, starting wars out of "national interest" then it's a bandit state, immoral, and needs to be put down by the coalition of the rest of the world like the dog that it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 04:12 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
This isn’t out of the question or unrealistic. After watching some Fox News vids over the last few months with Venezuela clearly deteriorating by the day, I’m starting to realize that there IS a consensus of fairly considerable size that would suppprt such a move.
Lot of countries are deteriorating, or have already done so. Are we going to attack them all?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 04:42 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,654,438 times
Reputation: 2522
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Trumps position has been anti-war, before and after election, and done much to avoid war which has worked out nicely so far. I do see many others in gov. interested in starting a new war somewhere. They are ever present no matter the party in power. Trump isn't among them.
President Donald Trump has publicly boasted that "his nuclear button is "much bigger" and "more powerful" than North Korean leader Kim Jong-un's."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-42549687

President Trump publicly said "North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States. They will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen."
https://www.azquotes.com/quote/1594552

President Trump publicly told Iran "NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE."
https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/23/polit...ntl/index.html

And in a Oval Office meeting about Venezuela President Trump asked his top aides the following question, "With a fast unraveling Venezuela threatening regional security, why can't the U.S. just simply invade the troubled country?"
Trump pressed aides on Venezuela invasion, US official says | Fox News


Why do you believe Trump is an anti-war president?

Last edited by chad3; 08-24-2018 at 06:06 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 04:57 AM
 
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
6,933 posts, read 2,390,775 times
Reputation: 5004
If we "invade" Venezuela it will be with bags of rice and beans to help the people.


Toilet paper too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 05:37 AM
 
59,053 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
This isn’t out of the question or unrealistic. After watching some Fox News vids over the last few months with Venezuela clearly deteriorating by the day, I’m starting to realize that there IS a consensus of fairly considerable size that would suppprt such a move. Dubya already proved that a pretext can be easily conjured up for an invasion that Americans will get behind.

Trump is under tremendous heat, and an intervention would definitely bury any possible headline from Mueller. Congressional Republicans are under even more heat, so why would they oppose it?

Fox’s Venezuela coverage is all about a pretext for war if you listen well enough. They keep screaming about socialism, dictatorship, oil, and how this is a humanitarian disaster. Also mentioned is how the average Venezuelan has lost 25 lbs from starvation. I don’t buy it.

This is beginning to sound like the runup to intervening...and I damn sure hope I’m wrong. We have no pressing national interests in Venezuela. None.

Might, if, should maybe, could, will he/she, etc. are ALL a waste of time.


Bye!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 08:56 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,206,841 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Lot of countries are deteriorating, or have already done so. Are we going to attack them all?
I hope not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
Might, if, should maybe, could, will he/she, etc. are ALL a waste of time.


Bye!
Okay. Your point? Would you back an invasion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Federal Way, WA
662 posts, read 313,311 times
Reputation: 678
Its just more Fox propaganda. They keep talking about Venezuela and socialism as their ongoing fear mongering of anything not far right of center. They are prodding their viewers to believe that all Democrats support socialism (a lie, only a few do), and that the only possible outcome of socialist policies is the disaster that is unfolding in Venezuela. Its a typical scare story/illogical conclusion that is the bread and butter of Fox reporting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top