Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
... We will have the court for long enough that the dopey millennials will get old and turn into their parents. We will be able to stop excessive progressive-collectivist overreach for decades after Trump is gone.
Like you.prevented the main stream media from left bias? Like you prevented the left from forming the "deep state"? Like you were going to make President Obama a one term president? Like you landed Hillary in prison?
Based on the performance of the right for the last decade or so I aint scared.
I don’t like self-serving, arrogant, power-hungry, selfish men. And there are plenty of them in the U.S. Senate. Some of them have been around a long time and they are still there.
how about self-serving, arrogant, power-hungry, selfish women that have been around a long time and still are, you okay with those are you?
There is literally no lie that Democrat leftists will not tell, as we have seen documented time and again by them here in this thread. They are nothing if not unconscionable smear merchants and liars.
There is literally no lie that Democrat leftists will not tell, as we have seen documented time and again by them here in this thread. They are nothing if not unconscionable smear merchants and liars.
Come on, don't sugar coat it. Are you trying to say there is no crime the right will try to cover up?
(See how that works?)
Women are very angry about how Kavanaugh treated Dr. Ford and even more angry about how the stupid, old white men in the Senate are treating Dr. Ford. McCaskill's comment today may actually garner a lot of female votes for her.
Women are not like blacks. They are not a monolithic voting block and contrary to popular leftist belief they do not all think with one mind.
How can she stand up strong when she got little evidence supporting her, evidence that an investigation can uncover. You and the rest of the GOP are already doubting your story, how will she have a fair hearing when it's going to be a 'He says, she says' situation?
Get your facts straight! She wants an investigation, he, the GOP and White House don't want one. What are they afraid of?
....And you call yourself a woman? Give me a break!
Regardless of how weak the evidence is, she's gone about this in a very cowardly way - in my opinion as a woman. Others will (obviously) disagree. SHE is the one who asked for a hearing, so I dislike that SHE is now calling for an FBI investigation after she was given what she asked for. Perhaps, if she showed up at the hearing, she could convince the committee of her story - while weak on evidence, she may be credible in person.
I'm not doubting "our" story. I'm not a die-hard Republican, first of all, and I don't see that the GOP has a story other than pointing out that there's probably not going to be any way to prove her allegations. Because of that, we're down to the core principal of innocent until proven guilty. I'm not the type of woman who will throw out due process just because someone who shares my gender makes a claim. Apparently you're the type of woman who has no problem disparaging someone female because she disagrees.
During the Anita Hill debacle the GOP response helped propel Clinton into office with a record female vote
Keep up the good work GOP!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.