Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm glad you posted this. Especially from the Wash Post.
When I posted a story about the "3 Amigos", Comey, Muller AND Rosenstein by Roger Stone tracking them back to as gar as Whitewater,it was immediately rejected by the left postesr on here.
You folks are TRULY living off in some fantasy world somewhere.
Get back to us when any of that ACTUALLY happens.
Trump is toast.
Obama on the other hand is just fine.
Ken
You post, "You folks are TRULY living off in some fantasy world somewhere. Get back to us when any of that ACTUALLY happens.
Then you post, "Trump is toast."
So I throw your own words right back at you, "Get back to us when any of that ACTUALLY happens."
"...In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case...."
So WHY did you leave all that out? Doesn't suit your political agenda? It's part of the very same press release by the very same FBI director. It's ALL Comey's opinion on the case. You just want to cherry pick it. Sorry, but doesn't work that way.
Aside from that, the FBI and the Justice Department could still today charge Hillary - but the heads of both have simply stood by Comey's assessment - likely because it's a weak case against Hillary and in fact doesn't show illegal intent etc (as Comey mentioned). If you disagree with that assessment, tell us where YOU got YOUR law degree. Until then you are just some ignorant poster on the internet - same as everyone else here. You are certainly entitled to your opinion of course, it's just not worth anything.
Ken[/quote]
"So WHY did you leave all that out?"
Because it EXPLAINS EXACTLY WHY Comey did NOT recommend charges against her and SHOULD HAVE.
Please show s ANYWHERE in the LAW where it says "intent" is required.
Comey IGNORED THE LAW. PERIOD!
"Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."
https://asweetdoseofreality.com/2016...lary-off-hook/
Quote: Gowdy: Good morning, Director Comey. Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private e-mail, was that true? Comey: Our investigation found that there was classified information sent. Gowdy: It was not true? Comey: That’s what I said. Gowdy: OK. Well, I’m looking for a shorter answer so you and I are not here quite as long. Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her e-mails sent or received. Was that true?
Comey: That’s not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents. Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said “I did not e-mail any classified information to anyone on my e-mail there was no classified material.” That is true?
Comey: There was classified information emailed.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton used one device, was that true?
Comey: She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as Secretary of State. Gowdy:Secretary Clinton said all work related emails were returned to the State Department. Was that true?
Comey: No. We found work related email,thousands, that were not returned. Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said neither she or anyone else deleted work related emails from her personal account. Comey: That’s a harder one to answer. We found traces of work related emails in — on devices or in space. Whether they were deleted or when a server was changed out something happened to them, there’s no doubt that the work related emails that were removed electronically from the email system. Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive. Did her lawyers read the email content individually? Comey: No.
Not a rubber stamp a repeat stamp to continue following Carter Page...hearings as you suggest don't ever happen anyway.
Look, its clear the methodical way in which trump is executing his witch hunt is by the order of Putin. He probobly was standing at that podium with the list of names Putin wanted taken out ,right there in his pocket.
No one in the White House is his deep throat. It s Putin.
And please extraordinary request to spy???
Trumps a walking talking compromised conflicted anti American.
Trump is the only player of disgrace as an American traitor at the very least for turning on Americans in speech and deed in favor of Russian friends.
At worst ...we will find out in due time.
Trump will not survive this and all those harmed by his abuse of power will be reinstated at hopefully not too much cost to the taxpayer.
Lies, no politician does that. Its never happened before, is that the issue ?
Transparent !!!
He will be the most transparent of them all if/when he declassifies the necessary documents.
We will know soon. He is probably reading my thread right now and considering it. I'll wait a bit more to decide on.....Transparent.
Dog gone it. The phone is ringing and its probably Hannity again trying to get me on his show and get my advice.
That guy just won't take no for an answer. Nice guy but he repeats himself to much.
Now where was I ? Oh yeah......
Its not to much to ask, with less than two years in office, to wait a little longer.
"He will be the most transparent of them all if/when he declassifies the necessary documents."
And why do the dems in Congress NOT WANT THEM unclassified?
Duped by the media is pretty funny since the media was credited for uncovering the details of the Watergate scandal. This is why the media is needed. And this is why Trump hates them so much.
So the media, in your view, exist to target one person and hold them accountable.
They don't need to hold other criminals in gov. accountable if they aren't the President ?
Who knew we elect a President so the media can do their job and remove them.
Maybe we should elect the media too.
Makes me wonder how people get into outer space without a spaceship or some astronaut training.
SpaceX is run by idiots spending all that money on rockets. All they need to do is find the right people and elevate them. Getting to Mars is going to be cheap after all.
"he media, in your view, exist to target one person and hold them accountable."
ONLY repubs.
It is AMAZING how they IGNORE the dems when they are involved in wrongdoing!!
I never said Trump wasn't smart enough to be elected. But I'm sure you will go over all my posts to try and find something lol I'm not wrong about anything with Trump. He's a narcissist who needs his accolades by holding rallies in states he won, but it's only in the counties he won that he hold rallies in. He needs his ego stroked. He is a pathological liar in order to boost his ego. He has no class or dignity. I could go on if you like. So tell me how I'm wrong about him.
And yet he's President and looks like that will remain the case. Maybe y'all should just prepare for 2020 as your chance to change things?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
