Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad_Jasper
The FBI may not be interested because they are already aware of their existence and find nothing of value to the review.
Additionally, I have a number of photos from gatherings with people I do not know and/or remember.
Furthermore, why would Ramirez pose for a photo of a gang rapists?
I'm fairly open to examining the evidence provided by the accusers, but so far.... still waiting.
|
Ok--so you didn't read any of the articles posted about this new evidence??
I guess being an ostrich goes with supporting Trump, et al GOP perps....
The FBI might not want to know because it has been told NOT TO KNOW...not to look...not to dish dirt...
1--Because if it was known that Kavanaugh KNEW about Ramirez before The Atlantic article not only did he lie to Hatch about when he became aware of it --
2--But it very likely could mean that HE/Kavanaugh remembered the event all on his own because he did it--
Pulled his penis out in public and stuck it in her face--while at a drinking party in the dorm--and having a good laught about it at the time...
And that brings me back to
3--When and how did Ed Whelan know about Christine Ford--and start his investigation of her prior to writing that dopplelanger story to protect Kavanaugh and insert another plausible candidate for the assault...
Whelan seemed to know about Ford before her name was public
How did he find that out????
Leaked from within the Congressional committee staff?
Leaked by someone at WaPo--to another reporter--that doesn't seen to make any sense really
But TOLD by Kavanaugh to Whelan first--because he knew who she was since he assaulted her---so that Whelan could get to work on the cover story---
Then leaked so that Whelan could have credibility to put the doppleanger story into play--
That seems very logical and plausible to me
No one had to tell Kavanaugh about Ford--
He knew she might being her story forward...