Privately owned property - Yours? Or open to use by all? (ethic, solution)

[MPowering1]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

I did due diligence. There are no public use easements recorded on my privately owned property. Period.

But it sounds like it doesn't matter whether there are public use easements recorded or not, does it? So in the end, you have two choices. You either remain in your home knowing this is what you have to live with or you decide you cannot live with it and you move.

Most of us are on your side, but you've already stated that you can't fight city hall.

[Dane_in_LA]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

No, I did not. There is no public use easement recorded on my property.

In other words, you were completely aware of what you were getting and is now POd that local authorities fail to agree with your interpretation of the law. Where did I put that tiny violin?

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by leebeemi

That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works...

Actually, that's EXACTLY how it works. Here's an example:

http://scc.ca.gov/webmaster/ftp/mali...ccess-maps.pdf

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA

In other words, you were completely aware of what you were getting

How would I know? Like I said, there are no public use easements recorded on my property. In direct contrast, THIS is how it's supposed to work:

http://scc.ca.gov/webmaster/ftp/mali...ccess-maps.pdf

[T-310]

Originally Posted by Joe90

It is inconsistency then, and you are an anti western authoritarian.

Individualism is an endangered concept, with you nanny staters running things.

So you legislate for stupidity. I legislate for me not being responsible for your poor choices and/or stupidity.


All the deadbeats and those who made poor choices in life are not my problem morally or financially.

[InformedConsent]

Here's the NC DNR map of public beach accesses. None are anywhere near my property.

https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/...f4bb0ec50b6f81

[Joe90]

Originally Posted by T-310

So you legislate for stupidity. I legislate for me not being responsible for your poor choices and/or stupidity.


All the deadbeats and those who made poor choices in life are not my problem morally or financially.

You don't believe in personal responsibility, which is the essence of the nanny stater.

Deadbeats aren't my responsibility ether, but the difference between us, is that I don't wish to punish the responsible, and brand/treat them as criminals.

[Dane_in_LA]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

How would I know?

Some call it "research", some call it "due diligence". If the seller or his agent withheld material information, I'm sure you have a helluva lawsuit. If you just didn't care to check, that's on you. Reality is not obliged to conform to your interpretation of local law and statutes.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

What say you all?

Backyards? Pools in backyards? Etc.? Community property, to be used by any and all at will? Or private property?

There is a difference between "private property" and "patented property".


One is open to interpretation and subject to confiscation, the other is not. This is why the government has stopped granting patent deeds.










Funny how 1 lone vote (so far) actually voted yes. I'm sure that'll change, especially after being pointed out.

[leebeemi]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

Here's the NC DNR map of public beach accesses. None are anywhere near my property.

https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/...f4bb0ec50b6f81

It doesn't need to. By statute and because of long-standing practice (which is cited in the statute), the public gets to use that sand. You can be stomp your foot & hold your breath all you want, but the statute exists.