Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is private property open for all to use, at will?
Yes 2 1.74%
No 113 98.26%
Voters: 115. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-18-2018, 05:15 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by phantompilot View Post
Yes, but the access that the statute is protecting is TO the seaward portion...hence the issue.
I get that. However, it does NOT allow the public use of privately owned dry sand beach absent any public use easement, hence the following easement map (as an example):

http://scc.ca.gov/webmaster/ftp/mali...ccess-maps.pdf
Quote:
Unless I'm misunderstanding the diagram, I don't see why there is distinction between wet and dry sand. How could you have ONLY dry sand? At some point it becomes wet sand.
Not true. This diagram illustrates the difference:

Difference between the publicly-owned and held in trust for public use part of the beach, and the privately owned (and therefore taxed as such) private property beach[/quote]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-18-2018, 05:17 PM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,648,625 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
And when there's no such easement?

If there is no deed easement, and you should check first, then you have every right to take legal action against the offender.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2018, 05:31 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
If there is no deed easement, and you should check first, then you have every right to take legal action against the offender.
Correct. There are several of us waiting to file suit in federal court pending the outcome of Knick v. The Township of Scott.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2018, 08:35 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,624,362 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Correct. There are several of us waiting to file suit in federal court pending the outcome of Knick v. The Township of Scott.
The next time you start a thread on this you should probably lead with this information instead of burying it after 170 posts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2018, 08:37 PM
 
Location: Sector 001
15,946 posts, read 12,297,747 times
Reputation: 16109
I guess we don't have that many communists on city-data after all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2018, 05:10 AM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,728,305 times
Reputation: 13892
My final thoughts on the topic....

Most people have no knowledge of or interest in the minutia of real estate statutes or hearsay "regulatory policy" pertaining to beaches. I initially viewed this thread as being more philosophical about what should be, as opposed to this is how it is....just because it's always been that way.

Having no interest in the latter approach, I say again that it makes no more sense for there to be public access to any portion of private beachfront property than for there to be public access to your backyard in Elko, NV. And no one has made a persuasive big-picture argument for public beach access because there isn't one.

Emergency scenarios and government personnel charged with public safety are not the public. When and where lives are at stake, it is understood and accepted that emergency personnel are going to go where necessary....whether it be on a coast or in Promontory, Utah. Those scenarios are thus irrelevant to this discussion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2018, 05:25 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
My final thoughts on the topic....

Most people have no knowledge of or interest in the minutia of real estate statutes or hearsay "regulatory policy" pertaining to beaches. I initially viewed this thread as being more philosophical about what should be, as opposed to this is how it is....just because it's always been that way.

Having no interest in the latter approach, I say again that it makes no more sense for there to be public access to any portion of private beachfront property than for there to be public access to your backyard in Elko, NV. And no one has made a persuasive big-picture argument for public beach access because there isn't one.

Emergency scenarios and government personnel charged with public safety are not the public. When and where lives are at stake, it is understood and accepted that emergency personnel are going to go where necessary....whether it be on a coast or in Promontory, Utah. Those scenarios are thus irrelevant to this discussion.
Agree 100%. That's why many are watching the SCOTUS Knick v. Township of Scott case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2018, 07:37 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,773,354 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post

There is no historical public use. If there had been, that was erased by the legal recording of private property deeds with the corresponding plats of survey that didn't list any public use easements. No one has ever legally challenged that regarding my property or that of anyone else I know, locally.
When did your municipal government issue the policy? Obviously, the public is aware of it, given the public uses private beach front property.

How does the public access your beach?

Sound like the state does not require sellers to disclose.

Sounds like your agent ( if used ) did not disclose.

Sounds like your closing attorney ( if used) did not disclose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2018, 08:03 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
When did your municipal government issue the policy?
It's not my municipal government, it's a hazy "policy" declared by a state agency in 2015. They're calling it "common law." It isn't an actual state law. It's likely to get challenged, again, as several areas have begun charging fees for a permit to drive on the beach, off-season. That's going to be a problem when municipalities, counties, etc., charge people fees to use someone else's privately owned property. The Emerald Isle case delved into that issue, but was dropped before it made it to the NC Supreme Court when the owners sold the property. The defendants (government) then moved for dismissal and it was granted.
Quote:
Obviously, the public is aware of it, given the public uses private beach front property.

How does the public access your beach?
They trespass on private property. There is no other way to get there. The town I live in (very small) maintains no public roads (they're all either state-owned or privately owned) and no public beach access points. That's also, by the way, why there are no public restrooms at or near the beach, and no waste cans or municipal waste pickup on the beach. We also have no lifeguards in my area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2018, 08:23 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Wow! Just looked at how much the local government's 4WD beach access permit costs (the 4WD access point is a few miles north of me, not here). $50 for a 10-day (consecutive) pass, and $150 for a seasonal pass... to drive and park on someone else's private property.

I can see charging a 4WD beach access fee at the National Park south of here, but how in the hell can local governments get away with charging the public fees to drive and park on someone else's private property?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top