Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-05-2018, 04:00 PM
 
62,968 posts, read 29,152,361 times
Reputation: 18591

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by subaru5555 View Post
You’d have a point if you weren’t lying about the $100 billion number to begin with.

It's no lie. I posted my source and they included their sources in their study. Shouldn't our number one concern be to keep them out of here simply because it's against our immigration laws anyway? There are so many other negative impacts they bring without even considering the fiscal impact. Let's start with the construction, landscaping jobs that they took from Americans by working for less and yes the employers are equally guilty. Doesn't that matter to you at all?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-05-2018, 04:03 PM
 
62,968 posts, read 29,152,361 times
Reputation: 18591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donna-501 View Post
June 26, 2018 05:24 PM

Updated June 27, 2018 10:39 AM

WASHINGTON
An effort to mandate that every employer use a system to check that their employees are working in the country legally was rejected by House leaders Tuesday — a strong signal that those pushing immigration reform do not believe it has enough support to be passed as part of a comprehensive immigration bill.
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/pol...213791734.html

So what's your point? I said Trump has it in his 2019 budget. Your link is dated June of this year. It's not the Republicans who were/are pushing some phoney reform which is just amnesty again. Why does amnesty have to be attached to it? It's because the Democrats are holding e-verify hostage to get their amnesty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 04:04 PM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,264,326 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
Chain link? That's what we have now and it's not working. Why do you oppose the wall already approved by congress back in 2006? Shouldn't congress fulfill their promise and fund it? Where that type of wall has been built on shorter sections of the border it has been very effective in deterring illegal entry.
I'm against this overpriced project. Congress approved something different than what he's doing. But, whatever, man.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 04:08 PM
 
Location: The High Desert
16,090 posts, read 10,753,057 times
Reputation: 31499
We could reposition Trump's failed businesses along the border with cardboard cut-outs of the thousands of people he screwed out of their pay and those he sent to the unemployment line. That might scare off a few folks. Why would anyone sign on to build a wall for this A-hole given his track record and his failed policies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 04:08 PM
 
62,968 posts, read 29,152,361 times
Reputation: 18591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazee Cat Lady View Post


Sure, it will! And Mexico will pay for it!
(Trump couldn't even get Congress to agree to pay for the Wall, even when he had control of both the Senate and the House.)

I have already addressed this constant harping about Mexico paying for the wall over and over again in here. I'm not going to keep repeating it over and over just read what I have said about in under my other posts in here.


For funding to pass on any legislation it takes some Democrats to be on board and there are many RINO's in congress that won't back Trump on anything he tries to do. So I don't know why you and yours keep harping about a congress controlled by the GOP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 04:10 PM
 
Location: The High Desert
16,090 posts, read 10,753,057 times
Reputation: 31499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
I have already addressed this constant harping about Mexico paying for the wall over and over again in here. I'm not going to keep repeating it over and over just read what I have said about in under my other posts in here.


For funding to pass on any legislation it takes some Democrats to be on board and there are many RINO's in congress that won't back Trump on anything he tries to do. So I don't know why you and yours keep harping about a congress controlled by the GOP.
There's also that small problem that the wall won't work...which is mainly why people are against the whole idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 04:11 PM
 
3,084 posts, read 1,547,097 times
Reputation: 6255
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
Um no, he didn't. Only 30 miles of it was built under his watch.


https://www.investors.com/politics/e...mplementation/
According to ABC news, most of the 700 miles was built under Obama
https://abcnews.go.com/US/700-miles-...ry?id=45045054
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 04:11 PM
 
62,968 posts, read 29,152,361 times
Reputation: 18591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donna-501 View Post
Why are we paying for it then? Maybe he could wait until he gets enough money from Mexico. That would be the correct thing to do.

The correct thing to do is to fund it because we need it. How is it not cost effective when illegal immigration costs us over $100 billion a year? We'd be money ahead by building it. A bi-partisan congress already approved it back in 2006 so it was their responsibility to fund it in the first place!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 04:16 PM
 
62,968 posts, read 29,152,361 times
Reputation: 18591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Williepaws View Post
According to ABC news, most of the 700 miles was built under Obama
https://abcnews.go.com/US/700-miles-...ry?id=45045054

Your link is lying. If anything was built it wasn't the type of wall approved. Only 30 miles of the approved double wall was built under Obama.


Why is Trump seeking money for the wall if it's already been built....think about it! He is no longer advocating for a wall along the entire border either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 04:21 PM
 
62,968 posts, read 29,152,361 times
Reputation: 18591
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunGrins View Post
There's also that small problem that the wall won't work...which is mainly why people are against the whole idea.
Really?


Where U.S.-Mexico border fence is tall, it works


https://www.npr.org/templates/story/...toryId=5323928


https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...umn/586853001/


https://nypost.com/2018/01/13/we-alr...-and-it-works/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top