Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is going to be interesting. Do you think she'll say she doesn't remember anything or lie as usual?
Quote:
Judicial Watch sought to compel further answers from Clinton after her written testimony under oath in October 2016 regarding her Clinton.com, non-state.gov email system.
The two questions Clinton will have to answer within 30 days, per Sullivan's ruling are:
Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.
During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.
This doesn't seem to be warranting much attention from anyone, weirdly. I tried doing a search a month back and there are only 5 articles period. I'll just admit, I am wondering some if it actually happened as he said. https://www.google.com/search?q=Judg...&bih=660&dpr=4
The Clinton e-mail controversy seems so quaint now, doesn't it? Oh my. She used a non-government server to hold some of her email. Gasp! It just pales in comparison to the many things alleged about Trump and his band of criminal cronies. I don't think this whatever it means is of interest to any but a few diehard nutjobs anymore.
The Clinton e-mail controversy seems so quaint now, doesn't it? Oh my. She used a non-government server to hold some of her email. Gasp! It just pales in comparison to the many things alleged about Trump and his band of criminal cronies. I don't think this whatever it means is of interest to any but a few diehard nutjobs anymore.
Hahahahah..that is hilarious that you are trying to play down the criminal actions of the Clintons as "quaint"
Quote:
many things alleged about Trump
I see, so you are admitting that Hillary knowingly and willingly exposed top secret documents, and hell, even the entire state dept server, and to you its no big deal, but you are totally ready to have Trump execusted for crimes against humanity for things you cannot even prove?
The Clinton e-mail controversy seems so quaint now, doesn't it? Oh my. She used a non-government server to hold some of her email. Gasp! It just pales in comparison to the many things alleged about Trump and his band of criminal cronies. I don't think this whatever it means is of interest to any but a few diehard nutjobs anymore.
No it doesn't. The fact that someone like Hillary was protected by the head of the DOJ and the head of the FBI (who was also using personal email) shouldn't be taken lightly.
These aren't hard-hitting questions, and I doubt they'll get very interesting responses.
If I were the Republicans, I would lay off all the Hilary stuff, make her think that she has a chance to run again, and then push this crap if she does.
It'll work on the same people it worked on before, and you'll have a Republican President again if she somehow makes it through the Democratic primary.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.