Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There are plenty of ranchers along the border that don't support a wall, is the government going to use eminent domain to erect the wall on those properties. How about the Rio Grande and Big Bend National Park in Texas and all those other ranchers in NM, do they agree to giving up their property. This is a lot for a resident to give up for a policy that will have minimal impact.
First off, how many times do I have to post the links proving that the good walls have had a very large impact on illegal entry before you stop spouting this nonsense?
Second, the ranchers that don't want a wall on their properties can just deal with the illegal trespassers, criminals, terrorists and the drug cartels all by themselves who will just funnel through their lands then. It would be sweet karma as they would be crying for a wall in no time.
Being against an ineffective wall solution is not the same as open borders.
What ineffective wall solution? Do I need to post those links again while you still remain in denial. Also the Border Patrol and Homeland Security disagree with you. But you know better than them, right?
A wall around the entire border which was Trumps campaign promise is not a rational solution. Yes it is effective in certain areas but selling this as a solution to illegal immigration is not going to work. This was a campaign slogan not a reasonable solution.
Did you just wake up from a coma? Trump no longer has a plan to wall off the entire border and hasn't for at least over a year or more now. The wall approved by congress back in 2006 is for the most porous areas of the border. You know, those areas that you admit would be effective in your above post. So why isn't that a reasonable solution in those areas? I even posted several links proving that the good walls do work in those areas. So what's your problem?
First off, how many times do I have to post the links proving that the good walls have had a very large impact on illegal entry before you stop spouting this nonsense?
Second, the ranchers that don't want a wall on their properties can just deal with the illegal trespassers, criminals, terrorists and the drug cartels all by themselves who will just funnel through their lands then. It would be sweet karma as they would be crying for a wall in no time.
Yes it has worked in certain situations but selling an entire wall as critical to our safety? Many dancers don’t want this so what is the solution.
Just to follow up with your link with a SNIPPET~~
(QUOTE) Two-thirds of Arizonans oppose President Donald Trump's plans for a border wall, according to a poll that appears to indicate friendlier attitudes toward immigrants than in the recent past.
The survey released this week found a majority of Arizonans prefer policies that facilitate commerce and improve the quality of life along the border instead of enforcement-heavy policies. The poll found 61 percent oppose laws favoring the deportation of immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally, another signature Trump proposal.
"The big takeaway is that Arizona seems to be moving away from the national conversation on the border wall. And that's very interesting as a border state," said Erik Lee, executive director of the North American Research Partnership. [/quote]
Yes it has worked in certain situations but selling an entire wall as critical to our safety? Many dancers don’t want this so what is the solution.
The "entire" wall is only for 700 miles and those are all the certain situations where's it's needed. Yes, any "porous" area of our border puts our safety as risk. Try again, it's fun to watch you so desperately trying to pretend we don't need the 700 mile long wall. Did you pass your objection on to congress in 2006? If so, why not?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.