Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The democrats Chuck and Nancy just came out of the meeting at the WH lying to the American people talking about keeping their oath to support and defend the constitution.
Yet, they support and defend and offer the rights to noncitizens to continue to break our laws and cross the border illegally without a structure in place to stop them.
Call it what you want.
One Senator called it a vertical monument to climate change. Whatever the name, its an important part of national security and meets the goals of the prime directive. National security is the #1 prime directive. Encouraging law breaking doesn't make the list !!!
Trump stands firm. Chuck and Nancy stand in disgrace !!!
When promises of $$$ are made by a lifelong grifter, wise people always get the $$$ up front!
Wake yourself up!
What grifters are you talking about ?
The big grifter democrats that want to tax people up to 90% and fund every scam they can come up with.
The democrat grifters are after money they didn't earn and will take it by force if given a chance.
The congress has had 40 years to solve this problem and received amnesty and promised to do it ( PROVIDE BORDER SECURITY AND CONTROL ENTRY TO THE COUNTRY) and haven't. No one person owns this. Washington gov. owns it and has long before the arrival of Trump to office.
Are you honestly saying you believe there was ever a Plan A beyond where we are now? That you thought Mexico would be paying? (Or that we were going to be able to force any other country to pay?) Going all the way back to his campaign, when he first beat the wall drum, did anyone ever, in their heart of hearts, really believe Mexico was going to be paying for this?
Americans paying for this wall was always Plan A.
Seriously? No one was naive enough to think otherwise...right?
By starting off with an outlandish proposal (to build a concrete wall that stretched over 2,000 miles across inhospitable terrain that would be paid for by another country whose need he justified, in part, by dogwhistle politics drew enormous attention then opposition.
Some on here keep asking where was the opposite to the 2006 legislation? There was not this kind of outcry because it was not THAT ^^^. Even then the legislation as passed proved impracticable and had to be modified in 2007.
Trump has never been able to effectively counter his initial missteps by coming up with a solid proposal. Instead, he keeps resorting to the tweets and now the Government shutdown.
Border security is important but it has to be based on an analysis of what works and is cost-effective.
The joke is what is happening at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Actually the joke is happening in the new House leadership. Impeach!!!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's progress !!!
So what's "immoral" about a border wall?
