Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Odd that some folks aren't upset about ripping children from refugee parents because "they broke the law." But when a rich white guy breaks the law, they're supposed to be treated very gently.
When ICE and Border Patrol agents removed the children from their parents custody it wasn't in body armor with guns drawn and it didn't take 25 agents per person to remove the children. They weren't "ripped" from anyone,
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight
Where did you get that?
From the Inspector General of the DOJ's report, which I bothered to read.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight
Good question for the judge that issued the warrant or the FBI but I'm betting that it is more than just lying to congress. Why does everyone in the Trump campaign need to lie so much.
The judge doesn't decide the manner of arrest, he just issues a warrant. The prosecutor can direct the FBI what manner of arrest he'd like. Like any good Bolshevik they know the value of intimidating others. Most citizens are okay with that because they don't pay enough attention to the justice system until it effects them or their family. And no, there is not more, otherwise it would have been in the charges.
As to lying, we don't know that anyone has lied, only that the prosecutor alleges they have. We also don't know the circumstances of the alleged lie.
Here is how it can go: An FBI agent asks you your favorite color. You answer "blue". Previously you had texted a friend that "red" is your favorite color. They can now arrest you for lying to a federal agent, even though your choice of favorite color isn't a crime.
When ICE and Border Patrol agents removed the children from their parents custody it wasn't in body armor with guns drawn and it didn't take 25 agents per person to remove the children. They weren't "ripped" from anyone, From the Inspector General of the DOJ's report, which I bothered to read.
The judge doesn't decide the manner of arrest, he just issues a warrant. The prosecutor can direct the FBI what manner of arrest he'd like. Like any good Bolshevik they know the value of intimidating others. Most citizens are okay with that because they don't pay enough attention to the justice system until it effects them or their family. And no, there is not more, otherwise it would have been in the charges.
As to lying, we don't know that anyone has lied, only that the prosecutor alleges they have. We also don't know the circumstances of the alleged lie.
Here is how it can go: An FBI agent asks you your favorite color. You answer "blue". Previously you had texted a friend that "red" is your favorite color. They can now arrest you for lying to a federal agent, even though your choice of favorite color isn't a crime.
Here's a flash for ya...when a child is unwillingly taken from their parent it is being ripped away from the parent. How the (explative) do you explain to a small petrified child what is going down?
Last edited by sickofnyc; 01-28-2019 at 01:42 AM..
Stone will break.
He will get a liberal judge and jury in D.C. and the Andy Weissmann treatment.
He hasn't got the solitary confinement or sentenced to the maximum security prison that Weissmann has in store for him.
No one knows Weissmann like Sidney Powell does. If they do they aren't talking. She wrote the book on Wassermann's corrupted justice and obtaining convictions by any means necessary and the lives of he innocent he destroyed. Andy Weissmann is the Grim Reaper and Mueller's wingman. The black tie, scythe-carrying personification of justice gone wrong at every opportunity and he's gotten away with it for twenty years.
Stone will talk not because of "liberal justice" but because Trump has proven, despite his signaling with the Arpaio & Bundy pardons, he does not return loyalty to his people and in general is too erratic and egomaniacal to be trusted. And Stone has proven he is loyal to no one but himself and his own interests (much like Trump).
Here's a flash for ya...when a child is unwillingly taken from their parent it is being ripped away from the parent. How the (explative) do you explain to a small petrified child what is going down?
Ask Barry how he explained it when he took kids from their parents and put them in cages. Maybe he can soothe your concerns.
Stone will talk not because of "liberal justice" but because Trump has proven, despite his signaling with the Arpaio & Bundy pardons, he does not return loyalty to his people and in general is too erratic and egomaniacal to be trusted. And Stone has proven he is loyal to no one but himself and his own interests (much like Trump).
Stone is in his 60's and may well be in his 70's before the indictments are all in, and the trials and appeals are all done.
Stone may be smart enough to realize that he's not getting a pardon. Trump has his own troubles to deal with and more evidence of obstruction of justice is not his best interests.
So now Stone is weighing whether he wants to spend the rest of any decent years he has left in a room with a stainless steel toilet.
No matter how many times you post this lie, it is still a lie.
Also, whatabout Obama/Clinton/etc. is tired and worthless. Ask for some new material.
No matter how many times you try and sugar coat it and deny, Barry is guilty of doing what leftists accuse President Trump of.
There are photos, reports, evidence all over the internet which you choose to ignore because it suits your purpose.
That fact alone, nullifies any credibility the left has when spewing "facts" about Trump, or even Barry for that matter.
No matter how many times you try and sugar coat it and deny, Barry is guilty of doing what leftists accuse President Trump of.
There are photos, reports, evidence all over the internet which you choose to ignore because it suits your purpose.
That fact alone, nullifies any credibility the left has when spewing "facts" about Trump, or even Barry for that matter.
No, he did not. This is a lie.
If there was so much as a smidge of evidence, Republicans would have been all over it. You think Gowdy would have focused on the endless, and ultimately pointless, Benghazi investigations if he'd had some real investigation to go after?
Get real.
Your "it's all over the internet" is nothing but nonsense spread by RWNJs.
Last edited by GotHereQuickAsICould; 01-28-2019 at 05:27 AM..
If there was so much as a smidge of evidence, Republicans would have been all over it. You think Gowdy would have focused on the endless, and ultimately pointless, Benghazi investigations if he'd had some real investigation to go after?
Get real.
Your "it's all over the internet" is nothing but nonsense spread by RWNJs.
Sort of like Trump claiming "people are saying..." before letting loose with another lie.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
