Do you trust a doctor that is willing to let a newborn die because the mother changed her mind?

[HeyJude514]

Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge

There's every doubt, because what he clearly was referencing was non-viable fetuses.

Forced birthers don't know the meaning of the term non-viable, and they refuse to look up the definition. That would blow their entire argument out of the water. Willful ignorance is bliss.

[newtovenice]

Originally Posted by ChristineVA

I see you've been "had" by the propaganda.

No doctor would do this. Go ahead and continue to misrepresent though. It apparently works.

It's already happened. They leave the babies to cry and die.

There are lots of former abortion workers who have left the industry because of this.

Do some research.

[ImissThe90's]

Originally Posted by jazzarama

Northam clearly distinguished between a fetus with 'severe deformities' and a non-viable fetus. [I admit up front that I don't know if there's an official medical definition of 'severe deformity.']


There's no doubt he was fine with allowing a viable fetus or infant with a severe deformity to die if the one doctor and the woman chose that option. You and many others might agree the woman should have that choice, but stop arguing that Northam was talking only about non-viable fetuses. [btw, how come he didn't mention any discussions with the father post-birth.]

Apparently you can't read???

Point me to WHERE he says he is fine with allowing a viable fetus to die. Until you can do that, you are simply misrepresenting what was said. Hell, in the very post that you quoted, which has his entire quote, he clearly says "non-viable" or with "severe deformities". No where does he mention a healthy baby. So take your chicken little nonsense somewhere else.