Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And this is damning, yet again, for the USA MSM who defended this woman for decades without any investigative journalism at all. It's their hypocritical double standard, where 98% of their reporting on Trump is negative, and 98% of it on Warren was positive.
And in the end.
Trump was right yet again.
i.e. "Pocahontas"
MAGA!
FAUXcahontas. What she did is inexcusable. Total fraud. She should resign from the Senate, being indisputably exposed as a race imposter.
Even if she already had the job, why mention it? If she didn't know for sure the relationship, family lore is not a good enough reason to include that info on any form.
In the beginning I thought the Harvard notification was silly, but harmless. But I also thought it was the first time. Is there a pattern?
Just my .02
Yes, there is a pattern. U Penn's faculty awards publication lists her as a minority award winner. She was a faculty member at U Penn before becoming a faculty member of Harvard Law School.
FAUXcahontas. What she did is inexcusable. Total fraud. She should resign from the Senate, being indisputably exposed as a race imposter.
Then no doubt you believe that Mr. Trump should also resign, being exposed as a race imposter.
In his 1987 book, The Art of the Deal, Mr. Trump claimed that his father's father immigrated from Sweden. It was a lie that Fred Trump came up with in the 1940s, due to his dealings with people of the Jewish faith: he did not want them to know that his family came from Germany. Son Trump repeated this lie, also to help business, and even incorporated the lie into his book.
So, Mr. Trump lied about his family's origins in order to make money, or 'to benefit from a lie', if you will.
I am certainly not excusing Senator Warren. However, her notation on the State Bar registration card (used for demographic purposes only; I too filled out one of those cards) was not a crime of moral turpitude. Perhaps Trumps lie is also not morally depraved, but he certainly benefited from the lie.
The issue is misrepresenting one's race. Elizabeth Warren did so. Trump didn't, unless you can prove he isn't White.
Is trying to pass himself off as a Swede any less dishonest than Warren passing herself off as a Native American?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
