Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
From what I can tell, Democrats are able to multi-task.
If they can get the information they are seeking, there may be no need to start impeachment proceedings.
It may be that that once they take a look at the financial records, have access to the complete Special Counsel report, and interview Mueller and others, they may have all the information they need to determine if impeachment is called for or not.
But without that information, how can they make that determination?
At this point all they have is the word of a man who lies constantly, and a report with about a third of it blacked out.
I agree with this. Dems should tone the impeachment talk but press ahead with the investigations and getting the tax and financial records. Then we shall see what we shall see.
I agree with this. Dems should tone the impeachment talk but press ahead with the investigations and getting the tax and financial records. Then we shall see what we shall see.
I think one problem is that they may not be able to justify the subpoena for the unredacted report without opening an impeachment hearing.
Hard to keep up with it all, but that may well be the problem.
What is the downside to impeachment talk? That those who defend Trump will defend him even stronger?
Strange how we've gone from any talk about interacting with Russians is inaccurate, dangerous, ... to there's nothing wrong with getting information from the Russians. Quite the leap.
According to Giuliani, there is nothing wrong with taking information from agents of the Russian government.
This is a lie. It is most definitely wrong, and may well be a violation of federal laws prohibiting accepting campaign contributions from foreign governments.
Better get busy prosecuting the Clintons for funding the Steele Dossier then.
Better get busy prosecuting the Clintons for funding the Steele Dossier then.
The hypocrisy of the left is astounding.
Can you really not tell the difference between a campaign paying an ex-British spy for information he has gathered from a number of sources, including Russian ones, and the Russian government giving free help to Trump's campaign?
This has been explained numerous times.
Accepting campaign assistance from foreign nations is against the law.
Paying for information is not.
It is astounding that you are unable to tell the difference.
When is Adam Schiff going to deliver on this evidence he has said he had(for 2 years now) to prove collusion that the Special Council didnt have.
It's in the Mueller report.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
