Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-04-2019, 11:24 AM
 
13,711 posts, read 9,228,503 times
Reputation: 9845

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post



LOL!!!!!


Is this thread supposed to help or hurt Sanders??



Lots of Americans would want a president who cut the extremely bloated military spending.



.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2019, 11:28 AM
 
18,069 posts, read 18,806,193 times
Reputation: 25191
If they can afford to spend millions of dollars on a gas station in Afghanistan, then they can afford to reduce their spending.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,717,658 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Your sensational thread title makes no sense. Nothing was exposed.

Bernie has been consistent about reducing defense spending for decades.

The Iraq War cost the US $ 6 trillion when interest on the incremental debt and VA benefits are factored in. Too bad a majority of Congress disagreed with Bernie at the time and instead voted to charge in.

Palin was and remains a proponent of poking the US beak in places it does not belong.

The issue with Bernie is that most of what he envisions is DOA in Congress and he knows it. He fires up his base no diff than Trump did and continues to do.

Poor Sarah, like Hillary, continues to try to remain relevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 11:45 AM
 
9,837 posts, read 4,633,384 times
Reputation: 7292
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post

WOW sounds great!


We out spend everyone on the planet we have been doing that for decade after decade after decade...

We spend more than the next 6 or more biggest military spenders in the world..


Yet we still have Americans cheering for it and complaining whenever anyone suggests reducing the size of our military...

Frankly i sometime wonder if Americans are actual some of the dumbest people on the planet. My fellow citizens appear to believe spending trillions of dollars to stay 10 years ahead of our foes makes sense.
there is a diminishing return on military spending. Your first 50 nukes mean vastly more than your 1000th nuke. the first few Carriers mean so much more than the 8-12th... and so on and so on.

The problem is Americans think any request for a reduction in military spending is the same as spitting on the flag....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 11:47 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,000,087 times
Reputation: 15559
Being cost effective doesn't mean you have to abandon all military.

Better use of funds.......that's what the goal should be.

And funny that some call for all military being pulled out of Europe -- which suggests a cut in spending on that front....but then criticize someone who talks about cutting the military budget.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 11:50 AM
 
Location: So Cal
52,214 posts, read 52,642,422 times
Reputation: 52723
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Your sensational thread title makes no sense. Nothing was exposed.

Bernie has been consistent about reducing defense spending for decades.

The Iraq War cost the US $ 6 trillion when interest on the incremental debt and VA benefits are factored in. Too bad a majority of Congress disagreed with Bernie at the time and instead voted to charge in.

Palin was and remains a proponent of poking the US beak in places it does not belong.

The issue with Bernie is that most of what he envisions is DOA in Congress and he knows it. He fires up his base no diff than Trump did and continues to do.

Poor Sarah, like Hillary, continues to try to remain relevant.
Palin is probably better left at the state and city level. She's not cutout for the big time events like the presidency. McCain's team screwed up when they didn't properly vet her. The wanted a "minority" on the ticket to compete with Obama and it just blew up on them.

Bernie, I don't know about him. I think at the end of the day he's just as bad as the rest of the politicians. Say one thing for the people and do other things in their personal lives. He's too old as well, we need some younger people in office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 11:52 AM
 
19 posts, read 9,497 times
Reputation: 43
Isn’t the American military one of the biggest socialist organisations in the world?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,608,156 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Palin exposes Sanders: Bernie Plans To SLASH Military Funds To Fund Socialist Agenda
It should be reduced, and many conservatives like Rand Paul will agree.

Why is Palin taking credit for 'exposing' something Bernie is very open about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 11:57 AM
 
7,473 posts, read 4,013,890 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Being cost effective doesn't mean you have to abandon all military.

Better use of funds.......that's what the goal should be.

And funny that some call for all military being pulled out of Europe -- which suggests a cut in spending on that front....but then criticize someone who talks about cutting the military budget.
We need one of these...…….

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truman_Committee
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2019, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,543,034 times
Reputation: 18814
Quote:
Originally Posted by STL74 View Post
Affordable housing? Improving Infrastructure? Improving our educational system? Geez, what a terrible guy! Satan I tell ya! Who would want any of that?
Well you do realize that Conservatives are totally against all of that. They do love our bloated military, tax breaks for the rich, and subsidies for big oil, farmers, and pharma.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top