Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They stand for decreasing self sufficiency and increasing dependency to ensure unlimited power.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op
Does anyone know exactly what the Dems stand for?
It's not what they]stand for, but what they stand against -- free enterprise, linked to individual responsibility, and permanent accountability.
You notice Democrats never ever come on here and disagree with this.
They have no Economic Program. They never talk about Jobs. They have zero ability to compete with what Trump is doing with our booming economy, record low unemployment and rising wages.
They never talk about freedom from the Govt and being self sufficient.
But you're a Racist and probably wouldn't understand.
I am currently watching FOX Business, and after the commercial, Maria Bartoromo will be interviewing Elizabeth Warren about her plan to increase taxes on corporations. This will essentially lower the value of companies while increasing their costs - and we will see the result in streamlining staffing, increased prices, and a stock market crash.
Democrats are essentially authoritarians. They want to control everything and everyone. They dont believe in freedom, free speech, free press etc. They want to control it all. They think they are more moral and smarter than everyone else not part of their little elitest club.
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,604,784 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976
First, thanks.
And second, the cost of everything would go up. How is that not a big burden on middle-income folks? (For the people on public assistance, the liberals would just vote an increase in benefits to cover the increase, or exempt them from the VAT altogether.)
Canadians pay less for healthcare than we do, and with better patient satisfaction and outcomes. You really don't know what you're talking about
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,604,784 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey
Those people are free right now to pay for their own healthcare coverage if they don't want employer provided coverage.
Given that the federal government ****s-up everything they do, why would depending on government for healthcare be preferable to depending on an employer?
If my employer offers ****ty insurance, I am free to find better insurance with a different employer.
With single payer, I'm stuck with whatever they say I have to accept.
Non employer subsidized insurance costs 3x as much or more, so it's a pretty ***tty deal to buy an individual plan with our current system
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,604,784 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin
You notice Democrats never ever come on here and disagree with this.
They have no Economic Program. They never talk about Jobs. They have zero ability to compete with what Trump is doing with our booming economy, record low unemployment and rising wages.
They never talk about freedom from the Govt and being self sufficient.
But you're a Racist and probably wouldn't understand.
I disagree with it. Mainstream Democrats have never been against free enterprise, myself included. We do think there should be social programs in addition to the free market, which can't solve everything, hence why "private prisons" are a moral hazard and unmitigated disaster just as one example....
Their entire strategy for the next Presidential election currently seems to be let us get an old white guy to complain about another old white/orange guy for winning last time.
Where is their vision for the future of a country whose economy is doing well with jobs bring created and not having declared war on anyone else for a while.
The Democrats need a plan and a candidate to deliver it.They don't seem to have either at the moment.
The DemocRATS stand only for themselves, and against all else.
And second, the cost of everything would go up. How is that not a big burden on middle-income folks? (For the people on public assistance, the liberals would just vote an increase in benefits to cover the increase, or exempt them from the VAT altogether.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220
Canadians pay less for healthcare than we do, and with better patient satisfaction and outcomes. You really don't know what you're talking about
How are they paying less if they now have to pay a VAT and other increased taxes?
Yes. Fully 85% of people were satisfied with their health insurance
I find that hard to believe, because the premiums were doubling every 6 years. Both parties agreed something had to be done, but GOP never bothered although they had full control for a very long time.
I am currently watching FOX Business, and after the commercial, Maria Bartoromo will be interviewing Elizabeth Warren about her plan to increase taxes on corporations. This will essentially lower the value of companies while increasing their costs
So, reducing the rates double digits had no effect in prices, but raising them little would have immediate impact
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
