White House "floated" proposal to release immigrant detainees in sanctuary cities (Reagan, racist)

[NaleyRocks]

Originally Posted by moneill

Sanctuary cities aren't asking for busloads of undocumented residents to be dropped off at their doors.
.

So Sancuary cities are fine with swarms of illegal immegrabts as long as they don’t actually have to deal with them?

I have to hand it to trump, this is a brilliant plan. Instead of fighting, give them what they want.

Unfortunately this is short term thing to a long term problem. 1- they’re not going to stay, they will spread out all over the country. 2-we will have hundreds of thousands to deport that could have been stopped at the border.

I prefer the close the border plan.

[tripleh]

Originally Posted by r small

I'm not a supporter of sanctuary cities but this politics of pettiness and payback should be beneath the office of the President of the United States. Unfortunately there's nothing that's beneath Donald J. (the "J" is for "juvenile") Trump.

giving the sanctuary cities exactly what they asked for is "petty"? I call it delivering what they asked for.

[McGowdog]

We would have to build a wall around those sanctuary cessholes.

It would be easier and cheaper to just deport democrats.

[Sydney123]

He probably said.. Hold my beer while I trigger the left again.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by moneill

No it isn't the entire point of being a sancturary city. It is clear you misunderstand and don't want to understand.

Actually, it is. Otherwise, sanctuary cities/states would turn them over for deportation. They refuse to do so. So, there you go...

[burdell]

White House "floated" proposal to release immigrant detainees in sanctuary cities


I guess he already has enough illegals at his golf properties.

[Bobdreamz]

Originally Posted by tripleh

giving the sanctuary cities exactly what they asked for is "petty"? I call it delivering what they asked for.

They haven't asked for hordes of immigrants. Sanctuary cities exist because of the failed immigration policies of the Federal government.
The idea of a sanctuary city is: We won't pay our local police, etc., to capture immigrants and turn them over to the federal government. That would be the job of the federal government.
That is the point.
What Trump is doing here is to punish his political opponents and use these people as pawns. How much more vindictive and petty can you get?

[chucksnee]

Originally Posted by r small

I'm not a supporter of sanctuary cities but this politics of pettiness and payback should be beneath the office of the President of the United States. Unfortunately there's nothing that's beneath Donald J. (the "J" is for "juvenile") Trump.

WOW, so you really must be mad at "I got a phone and pen" obama....basically what that means, if I don't like what say, I'll just do it....that is pettiness to the "T."


But you don't care....

[r small]

Originally Posted by tripleh

giving the sanctuary cities exactly what they asked for is "petty"? I call it delivering what they asked for.

Ain't going to happen anyway. Fortunately Trump seems to have at least a few people in is administration with half a brain and his proposal was DOA.

[InformedConsent]

Here you go... Let's give California what they want... Win/win!!!

California Governor Newsom Vows ‘Sanctuary To All Who Seek It’ In Inauguration Speech - CBS News