AG Bill Barr Senate Testimony on Mueller Report – 10:00am ET (KKK, pay)

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by chucksnee

None, but probation for 2 years....


What did Hillary get?

You said anyone else would be in jail, evidently that was exaggeration.

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by Arabianhorsebreeder

Dems sang his praises until he presented the report that didn't find evidence that Trump was a bad guy, just like Mueller.

Democrats praised Barr?

[Donna-501]

Originally Posted by Arabianhorsebreeder

Dems sang his praises until he presented the report that didn't find evidence that Trump was a bad guy, just like Mueller.

That never happened.

[KayAnn246]

Originally Posted by ColoradoOnMyMind

Ok, easy. “I released a summary of conclusions that Mueller said were accurate. Once the required redactions were made I released the report to Congress and the public.”

Whatever else is said by the Dems on that is just Russian collusion level nonsense

That explains why Trump's WH sent a letter to Mueller to discredit his report today. So now since most of the country does not believe the president and his supporters lies of "total exoneration" and the Barr summary, the new radical right tactic is to discredit Mueller. The desperation of the radical right is unhinged.

[fusillirob1983]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

Democrats praised Barr?

I know, right? I recall they fought pretty hard for him not to be AG. Obviously little they could do though without control of the Senate.

[dashrendar4454]

Originally Posted by KayAnn246

That explains why Trump's WH sent a letter to Mueller to discredit his report today. So now since most of the country does not believe the president and his supporters lies of "total exoneration" and the Barr summary, the new radical right tactic is to discredit Mueller. The desperation of the radical right is unhinged.

It doesn’t matter what you believe. That doesn’t change reality



Of course radical liberals are angry and pouting

[HockeyMac18]

Originally Posted by slo1318

It leads nowhere. At some point you have to look at the totality of the situation.

How can you look at "the totality of the situation" without all of the information to actually look at the totality of the situation???

Your post doesn't make sense in relation to the post to which you were responding...

[Donna-501]

Originally Posted by fusillirob1983

I know, right? I recall they fought pretty hard for him not to be AG. Obviously little they could do though without control of the Senate.

That's how I saw it too.

[HockeyMac18]

Originally Posted by chucksnee

Funny, 19 lawyers, APPROX. 40 FBI agents, intelligence analysts, and forensic accountants, disagree with you.

BTW, has Mueller refuted what barr stated about the conference call he had about the letter?

Disagree about what?

[HockeyMac18]

Originally Posted by Quick Enough

"If you believe the president who is a pathological liar,"

I'd BET you VOTED for SEVERAL pathological liars. But, NOW you are "concerned".
Oh, the HYPOCRISY!

Name WHO you HAVE voted for and I'd bet we can find LOTS of lies they told.

Or are you too chicken?

Feel free and compare others to Trump. https://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

There is literally no contest - has there ever been a more pathological liar in politics?