Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why then block it or subpoena ? Makes no sense for neither side if it’s an open book to the Congress - nope
From post 153:
Quote:
You know that 98% of the Mueller report is released unredacted, except the SE grand jury material. However, the hate-Trump, TDS afflicted Democrats in the House, demand even the the secret evidence grand jury material be unredacted, in violation of federal law. This, coming from the same exact Democrats in the House, who back in the 1990s, demanded that NOTHING from Pres. Clinton's Starr report should be released.
My question hasn't been answered...are there different versions out there ? If there are only redacted and unredacted then Warren had access to the entire report.
The 'special' edition has some of the redactions lifted, but those who are allowed to see it can not reveal what they have seen. Most of the redactions are still in place in that new edition.
After viewing the 'less' redacted report Lindsey Graham stated that it wasn’t clear to him why some of that information was redacted at all. This suggests that the congress is being scammed by the AG.
Barr is offering this premium version as a maneuver in the hopes it will stop the release of the full report.
The congress wants the completely unredacted report.
Trump refused to be interviewed by Mueller. And insulted Mueller on Twitter. And issued vague public threats against witnesses. Not exactly full cooperation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha
Then, after these many years of being called a traitor, we find that NO ONE, not one single American citizen was guilty of colluding with Russians.
Too early to make that conclusion. Over a dozen cases still ongoing, including Roger Stone, who was in contact with WikiLeaks and "Guccifer 2.0," who were Russian GRU agents (according to Mueller's indictments).
He refuses to release it because he can do it (so far) and to mess with the opposition. Why not, it’s fun, and who is going to be hurt in the long run?
too funny....a few weeks ago the dems were daring him to do it
...now he did it, and they are all hysterical
DOJ ... “The Attorney General could not comply with the House Judiciary Committee’s subpoena without violating the law … “Chairman Nadler’s actions have prematurely terminated the accommodation process and forced the President to assert executive privilege to preserve the status quo. No one, including Chairman Nadler and his Committee, will force the Department of Justice to break the law.”
I'm assuming that "full Mueller Report" just means the report without any redacted parts not the report in its entirety as some seem to think. The report with fewer redacted sections is still available for review. Mueller should be able to attest to the validity of redactions in a closed door session. There's some grandstanding on both sides -- painted into opposite corners of the same room.
You aren’t going to see the grand jury material no matter how much you cry and stamp your feet
The public doesn't need to see it. Congress does so they can do their jobs. That's why we elected them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
