Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-25-2019, 08:35 PM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,605,383 times
Reputation: 7801

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cttransplant85 View Post
This will be a massive win for republicans. Democrats are overplaying their hand.
We shall see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2019, 08:49 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,954 posts, read 49,221,262 times
Reputation: 55008
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzy24 View Post
We shall see.
Dems would not have Subpoenaed if they did not have a plan and Mueller is also a Trump hater.

Repubs need to turn the questioning over to 2 or 3 of their main guys. Jordan and Ratcliffe would be fine. Gohmert and Doug Collins could fill in the gaps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 09:15 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,663,022 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasLawyer2000 View Post
This is not true. He simply cannot say anything contradictory to the report. Since the report identifies multiple attempts to break the law, it could be interesting.
In other words... He will be able to answer all the Republicans questions, but very few of the Democrats, or be in a perjury problem, unless he has the report memorized.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 10:05 PM
 
Location: Self explanatory
12,601 posts, read 7,234,149 times
Reputation: 16799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
Dems would not have Subpoenaed if they did not have a plan and Mueller is also a Trump hater.

Repubs need to turn the questioning over to 2 or 3 of their main guys. Jordan and Ratcliffe would be fine. Gohmert and Doug Collins could fill in the gaps.
He is a life long Republican, and has put country before party, unlike a majority of Republicans.

On the other hand, Trump may pull something stupid to detract from this and try to shift the dialog.

We'll find out soon enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 10:18 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,875 posts, read 26,532,311 times
Reputation: 25777
Makes me wonder just how stupid the Dems will make themselves look this time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 10:30 PM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,103,478 times
Reputation: 9726
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Town FFX View Post
He is a life long Republican, and has put country before party, unlike a majority of Republicans.

On the other hand, Trump may pull something stupid to detract from this and try to shift the dialog.

We'll find out soon enough.
Trump doing something stupid is always a good bet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 10:58 PM
 
3,698 posts, read 1,365,340 times
Reputation: 2569
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
the man who actually wrote the report will be answering questions, and not the hand-picked Trump sycophant AG.


https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1143685841769963521
Wait a minute. I thought you people have been saying there is damning evidence in the report if we just read all 440 pages of it.
If you need to get Mueller to testify thats because the report does NOT have enough evidence in it and you think you might have some luck badgering Mueller into giving up something not included in the report. Why is this not obvious to you?
Mueller already stated the report contains everything he has to say on the matter.
Why are you wasting the publics time and money on this fruitless witch hunt, and making a mockery of due process?
Why dont you trot out one stupid former democrat who read something on facebook and voted for Trump instead?
It didnt happen and this bull**** about interference in a sweeping systemic fashion is a complete fabrication of the left.

For two and a half years YOU have been the threat to our democracy and this is just about enough. Grow up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 11:14 PM
 
3,698 posts, read 1,365,340 times
Reputation: 2569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Town FFX View Post
He is a life long Republican, and has put country before party, unlike a majority of Republicans.

On the other hand, Trump may pull something stupid to detract from this and try to shift the dialog.

We'll find out soon enough.
Its as if you didnt see the near mutiny at the gop convention.
Dumb leftist talking point that reveals your intellectual dishonesty or ignorance.
Because someone is a republican they must fall in line with Trump and not their allies protecting the washington dc status quo.

Lets note that Bob Mueller served as FBI director for four years under obama, including being asked to serve an additional two in 2011 past the normal ten years.
He is a long time ally of anti Trump official James Comey and was head of the FBI at the time the entire justice dept was turning a blind eye to a long list of Hillary Clintons offenses.

I dont use the term D*** S**** , ever, but Mueller is as status quo as it gets and should be expected to oppose Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 11:20 PM
 
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
17,665 posts, read 6,928,439 times
Reputation: 16575
Excellent.

Can't wait to hear the answer to this question: When did you conclude there was no collusion between the Russians and Donald Trump and his campaign?

Follow-ups: Why did you then take so long to end the inquiry? How many process crimes against Trump acquaintances were discovered/prosecuted after you concluded there was no Russian collusion?

Mueller and the Democrats tried a coup and failed. And it was all planned by Obama, the most corrupt President in U.S. history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 11:25 PM
 
Location: Somewhere out there.
10,535 posts, read 6,172,858 times
Reputation: 6575
I'm not holding out a lot of hope that anything will change after this.
The only real news that can possibly come out of it is whether it was Muellers intent that Congress should be charging Trump for obstruction of justice. I think that was his intent but I think they will he hard pushed to get him to say that.

Other than that Mueller is not going to say anything different than what is already in the report.

Still, it will be interesting to hear it straight from the horses mouth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top