Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But Republicans are running on Americans are under attack by illegals.
If you accuse Mayor Pete of inciting violence wit his words then you HAVE to accept that Trump's mantra for three years that illegals are 'ruining' this country and are 'attacking' our American values will also incite violence.
Oh look -- it did.....
And there is some truth that Anti-Fa violent members will use this kind of rhetoric to 'fight' against the violent white supremacists.
But it goes two ways -- politician on both sides use the argument.
Well, being an illegal alien is.....illegal.
But there it’s not a crime for being a white nationalist or antifia or black panther or kkk
Why every time these mass shooting takes place, people on the right just automatically start bringing up Antifa, abortions, and black on black crime? I mean it's like clock work around here. It's like when one child gets in trouble, he's going to start telling on the other kids because he got caught. Mass shooting is a specific topic, and have nothing to do with the others.
Why every time these mass shootings take place, people on the left just automatically start bringing up gun control. I mean it's like clockwork around here. One mental health nutcase goes off with a gun and everyone else must surrender our second amendment rights.
Instead of a dog whistle, there is a clearly defined definition to what Trump is spewing.
Quote:
Public speech that may incite violence, even without that specific intent, has been given a name: stochastic terrorism, for a pattern that can’t be predicted precisely but can be analyzed statistically. It is the demonization of groups through mass media and other propaganda that can result in a violent act because listeners interpret it as promoting targeted violence — terrorism. And the language is vague enough that it leaves room for plausible deniability and outraged, how-could-you-say-that attacks on critics of the rhetoric.
Translation - "I've never actually seen a racist tweet, but they were talking about them on the view. Sure there are racists tweets, here's a link. But any that you quote aren't the ones i was talking about."
No, the translation is, "Why bother trying to satisfy somebody who will ignore it when I post it?"
Sad that Buttigieg and Beto are using the slaughter of innocent propel to reenergize their dying campaigns
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
