New York Times Focuses On New Narrative (racism, borders, election)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Did it sometimes seem like the New York Times' entire focus was Trump-Russia? Like it built its newsroom around one story? Now, top editor says it did just that. But after Mueller report, paper has had to retool. New focus? Trump racism.
I saw that yesterday. Quite a story, but really nothing surprising. Slate.com has the transcript of the meeting, which was evidently leaked by an NYT employee. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...ranscript.html
You know you've gone off the rails as a liberal rag when slate.com raises its eyebrows at you.
From the transcript:
Quote:
Staffer: Hello, I have another question about racism. I’m wondering to what extent you think that the fact of racism and white supremacy being sort of the foundation of this country should play into our reporting. Just because it feels to me like it should be a starting point, you know?
I find it appalling that a NYT staffer believes that racism was the 'foundation of this country.' It was certainly present, but the foundation can be found in the Declaration and Constitution. That is precisely how we were able to get over past racism. Remember MLK referred to the Constitution as a 'promissory note.' That was the 'foundation,' not racism or white supremacy.
I have been reading the Times on and off since the 1990s. The Times is a great source for International news and foreign policy. Best I have seen. They go into great depth on a International story and you get more details you do not get in other papers. Right now there is a lot of anti-Trump stuff in the International coverage but you learn to go around it, and some of it is true anyway.
But the editorials? I never read them anymore. Even when I was younger and more liberal then I am now, I found them unbalanced, unfair and unrealistic in the way the real world works. They seem to not have so much of a liberal viewpoint of the world but more an Elitist liberal Manhattan upper class viewpoint of the world that so different from the Queens where I used to live.
Their columnists are not much better. People whose pieces I used to read, I have lost respect for. Some still spouting the same tired free trade religion or open borders for the last 3 decades. I used to think what rock is this guy been under all these years? But now I am like, who is paying you to say this bs propaganda?
They will switch to the "coming recession" like the others soon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91
Yes, they need to push that narrative in the hopes that they can break consumer confidence, and help create a recession.
Yeah, I am thinking the same thing. I am not sure if the Times is involved but I was surprised to see "this recession is coming" narrative pop up all over the place all of a sudden.
Now I am not sure if I have become so cynical that I automatically think that the Democrats and their media lackeys are behind it or if it is really true (or potentially true). Because it does not look like a recession is coming here on Long Island anyways.
It was Russia, Russia, Russia for over two years. Then as soon as Mueller's testimony was a big nothing-burger, they switched to racism/white supremacy.
Now you hear that phrase literally dozens of times per day.
My 10yo son remarked that the "news sure does like to say that word a lot". Good grief.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.